forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: jzwanzig@dal.ca
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Cell optimization and symmetry breaking
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:24:50 +0200
Dear colleagues,
I find that when minimizing the forces in a crystal structure, say by doing a
run with "ionmov 2" and "optcell 2" the resulting output structure (acell,
rprim, xred) together breaks the original input symmetry. Never by much, but
certain symmetry operations will have residuals of around 1E-7, which is
worse than the built-in 1E-8 threshold. So the symmetry of the "optimized"
structure is lower than the original input. Sometimes this is easy to detect,
for example when all the atoms are on high symmetry positions and the acell
variable is "optimized" to (for example) "1.11111111 1.11111111 1.11111112".
However, some unit cells I work with have complicated shapes but still some
symmetry. Why does the optimization run break symmetry in this way? Is there
a setting I should be using that I don't know about?
Thanks,
Joe Zwanziger
- Cell optimization and symmetry breaking, jzwanzig, 08/27/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] Cell optimization and symmetry breaking, Matthieu Verstraete, 08/27/2007
- RE: [abinit-forum] Cell optimization and symmetry breaking, Josef W. Zwanziger, 08/29/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] Cell optimization and symmetry breaking, Xavier Gonze, 08/27/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] Cell optimization and symmetry breaking, Xavier Gonze, 08/28/2007
- RE: [abinit-forum] Cell optimization and symmetry breaking, Josef W. Zwanziger, 08/29/2007
- RE: [abinit-forum] Cell optimization and symmetry breaking, Matthieu Verstraete, 08/29/2007
- RE: [abinit-forum] Cell optimization and symmetry breaking, Josef W. Zwanziger, 08/29/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] Cell optimization and symmetry breaking, Matthieu Verstraete, 08/27/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.