forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: "Anglade Pierre-Matthieu" <anglade@gmail.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Ca1-xSm2x/3TiO3 geometry relaxation
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:56:41 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YPMKjfFuWSMVmOKrDlm/2DHAdZjloVjjkC44bd92eSQGaVBMohyl8WDPpDCv2teyOy/t5gHy3GTB6ex2FFiZHQUXW3NkAbp8/8/POk9IAE+TiL+y8/9/wAZGDcY+e3yaaQjbS1ILBK+7oJBMRhOO5G/qywPjrTmUsELVYpnXWSM=
PS: Because your goal is cell optimisation you don't need such a
drastic criterion as "tolvrs 1e-18" for SCF convergence. You'd better
use something like toldff = [0.1-0.01]*tolmxf.
Moreover tolmxf is probably much too small. Even with 1e-6 or 1e-5
you will get a perfectly converged system; likely more converged than
the absolute precision allowed by your k-point and ecut.
On 9/14/07, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu <anglade@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 1) Instead of "pulayit" use "npulayit" which I think is the correct form
> 2) use "iprcel 45" for instance
> 3) if your geometry is too far from equilibrium, instead of CG for the
> ion movement prefer a MD-viscous damping for some iterations.
>
> regards
>
> PMA
>
> On 9/14/07, david.hendry@mandmd.com.au <david.hendry@mandmd.com.au> wrote:
> > Dear Abinitians,
> >
> > I'm trying to relax a single unit cell of CaTiO3 with two Ca removed and
> > one Sm added. The geometry does not converge fast enough: after 200
> > nsteps the potential residual is still above 1. Each ntime step
> > therefore only marginaly reduces the atomic forces. The input file is
> > added below. I'm using Troullier-Martins norm-conserving psps. Might
> > there be some way to allow this to work more efficiently?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > David.
> >
> >
> > #Definition of lattice parameters
> > #********************************
> > acell 10.1629 14.4451 10.2329
> >
> > #Definition of atomic positions and types
> > #****************************************
> > natom 19
> > ntypat 4
> > znucl 22 20 62 8
> > typat 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
> > xred 0 0 0.5
> > 0.5 0 0
> > 0 0.5 0.5
> > 0.5 0.5 0
> > 0.9937 0.25 0.03339
> > 0.5063 0.75 0.53339
> > 0.4937 0.25 0.46661
> > 0.0707 0.25 0.4842
> > 0.4293 0.75 0.9842
> > 0.9293 0.75 0.5158
> > 0.5707 0.25 0.0158
> > 0.711 0.037 0.2884
> > 0.789 0.963 0.7884
> > 0.289 0.537 0.7116
> > 0.211 0.463 0.2116
> > 0.289 0.963 0.7116
> > 0.211 0.037 0.2116
> > 0.711 0.463 0.2884
> > 0.789 0.537 0.7884
> >
> >
> >
> > #Echange-correlation functional
> > #******************************
> > ixc 1
> >
> > #Plane wave basis and k-point grid
> > #*********************************
> > #pawecutdg 60
> > ecut 42
> > ngkpt 7 5 7
> > nshiftk 1
> > shiftk 0.5 0.5 0.5
> > nband 53
> > ngfft 60 90 60
> >
> > #Relax ions and unit cell
> > #************************
> > #chkprim 0
> > kptopt 1
> > iscf 7
> > pulayit 20
> > tolvrs 1.0d-18
> > tolmxf 1.0d-8
> > nstep 200
> > optcell 0
> > ionmov 3
> > ntime 200
> > dilatmx 1.1
> > ecutsm 0.5
> > prtwf 0
> > prtden 0
> >
>
>
> --
> Pierre-Matthieu Anglade
>
--
Pierre-Matthieu Anglade
- Ca1-xSm2x/3TiO3 geometry relaxation, david . hendry, 09/14/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] Ca1-xSm2x/3TiO3 geometry relaxation, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 09/14/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] Ca1-xSm2x/3TiO3 geometry relaxation, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 09/14/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] Ca1-xSm2x/3TiO3 geometry relaxation, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 09/14/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.