Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] problem

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] problem


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "D. R. Hamann" <drhamann@mat-simresearch.com>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] problem
  • Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:42:38 -0400

Hi m_mousavi,

In general I agree with Pierre-Matthieu's comments below, but would like to clarify the issue a bit more.

For most purposes, the unit cell should be fully relaxed so that the stresses are effectively zero before doing a calculation of the elastic tensor using the response-function (or any) method. For some purposes, however (such as geophysics) you may want the elastic constants under high-stress conditions. It is OK to use the response-function calculation in this case, but the results must be corrected as discussed in doc/theory/elasticity-oganov.pdf, using Eq. (17) in that document to correspond to the most widely used definition of elastic constants under stress. Since recent Abinit releases output the stress tensor in a DDB file, in principle this correction could be computed as part of the anaddb post-processing needed for almost all elasticity calculations, but this has not yet been implemented.

Best regards,
Don Hamann



Anglade Pierre-Matthieu wrote:
Hi,

If you use the experimental data you may run into a few problems
related to a potentialy high pressure.
Suppose the PSP predict the lattice parameter with an error of ~ 1%
with respect to experiment and your bulk modulus is 100 GPa, You will
evaluate elastic constant and other properties under a pressure of 1
GPa~ 10^4 atm.
Also, the computation of elastic constant by means of response
function may not allow you to use pressure. Or may not handle this
very well. Yet if you want try, and many will be intersted if you can
come back and share your findings here.
Endly, it is sometime faster and safer to obtain the elastic constant
by "manual" finite difference method. At least, you can use it to
check your results.

regards

PMA

On 9/26/07, m_mousavi1980@yahoo.com <m_mousavi1980@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi

I want to run elastic lesson for zno

can I use experimental latice parameter for input acell.

How can I understand my out put for telast_1 IS true.

regard





--
D. R. Hamann
Mat-Sim Research LLC | Deptartment of Physics
P.O. Box 742 | and Astronomy
Murray Hill, NJ 07974 | Rutgers University
phone: 908-370-8079 | 732-445-4381

email: drhamann@mat-simresearch.com





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page