Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] about dos and integrated dos

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] about dos and integrated dos


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Matthieu Verstraete <mjv500@york.ac.uk>
  • To: "forum@abinit.org" <forum@abinit.org>
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] about dos and integrated dos
  • Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 18:49:25 +0100 (BST)


Hello Shinekin,

I'm not sure exactly what you are referring to, but in principle you're right, the integrated DOS is just the integral, and there shouldn't be any particular difference. The DOS is built, in the standard version, from a sum of dirac peaks which are smeared with the electronic temperature. If you use a very small smearing the peaks will be huge to get the correct integrated weight. The integrated DOS will have a jump but is usually much smoother (what with being integrated and all).

Use a larger smearing or, (even better), a denser kpoint set, or the tetrahedron method, which gives a continuous curve. See prtdos 1 2 3.

Matthieu

--
================================================================
Dr. Matthieu Verstraete mailto:mjv500@york.ac.uk
Dept. of Physics, University of York, tel: +44 1904 43 22 08
Heslington, YO10 5DD York, United Kingdom fax: +44 1904 43 22 14



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page