The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

[ธนูสิทธิ์ บุรินทร์ประโคน <thanusit@kku.ac.th>]

Dear Matteo 

We've tried to comment the line number 1236 of the subroutine
screening.F90 but cannot get it compiled. Could you please give me a
litlle bit more details (code) of the line that needs commenting? I
wonder if the line number of this piece of the subroutine has been
alterred. Thank you.

Best regards
Thanusit Burinprakhon


> On October 10, 2007 6:01:57 PM ICT, "Matteo Giantomassi"
<gmatteo@pcpm.ucl.ac.be> wrote:
> 
> 
> > I have tried GW calculation with the same input file (with or without
> > mkmem=0) using paralleised Abinit  V5.4.3, and without commenting the
> > line number 1236 of the subroutine csigme.F90.
> 
> Well, I hope you've commented screening.F90 instead of csigme.F90. 
> Also because in csigme.F90 the line 1236 doesn't exist!
> 
> >The jobs have been
> > succesfully completed.  This seems OK to me. Is it still better to
> > comment the line, though?
> 
> If you want to run a screening calculation (optdriver=3) with 
> version 5.4.3, you have to comment that line.
> 
> BTW: the mkmem=0 option is not yet implemented when optdriver=4. 
> You might try the parallelism over bands (i.e gwpara=2), if you really
need 
> to decrease the memory per processor,
> 
> Regards,
> Matteo Giantomassi
> 
>