forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: matthieu verstraete <mjv500@york.ac.uk>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] ep coupling for potassium
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:17:42 +0100
Also, I decide to increase qpoint mesh to 4x4x4 than 2x2x2.This may be sufficient, but probably not. Depends on the dispersion of the phonons and elphon quantities.
In short, but, the result was terrible. the Tc was estimated to be ~ 10e15 Kelvin.Is this the McMillan or the (very alpha stage) Eliashberg equation value? The latter should never be trusted, and I have done very few tests. Btw if anyone does do tests and has comments or improvements, please don't hesitate to share. If the coulomb mu value is not physical or the coupling strength is too low (eg if your DOS is too low) then you'll get an exponential explosion of Tc. It doesn't mean much, it's too sensitive a value.
Yes. You can reduce the qpoints, but not the perturbations at a given qpoint. You can run abinit with a kpoint grid set to the qpoint grid you want to use - correct ngkpt, shiftk and everything. In the header information you will have the reduced nkpt and kpt coordinates to be used in the phonon generation.
My question is following,
1. To generate higher mesh qpoint, suppose simple fcc case, how many datasets I should try with ? anaddb asked me to generate 64 qpoints in general.
But thanks to symmetry, we can recude it ( am I right?). I was not so sure in this problem. I tried the smallest set of qpoints.
As above: examine the phonon dispersion and how it changes going from 2x2x2 to 4x4x4.
Anyhow, anaddb accepted it. 8 qpoints was reasonable number 8(3+1) + 1 = 33 dataset was okay. But was it enough ?
Especially when generating qpoints, could you recommend a good literature to follow ? not Monkhost and Pack paper.
2. What could be a critical parameter to check the convergence of the calculations ?make sure the 2DTE are converged for each phonon also.
As far as I know, in addition to some basic convergence tests such as ecut , # of kpoints, tolerances, we can check spectral functions' behaviors. something more ?Are your phonons ok? Have you checked the convergence of the ground state wrt ecut and kpoints? The hgh are notoriously hard pseudopotentials. The parameters look ok, globally. Is your acell correct? Not high pressure stuff or anything?
Without more information from your anaddb output I can't say if things are really going wrong or not. Instead of looking at Tc you should tell us about the frequencies, the elphon coupling parameter, and linewidths. How do they compare to literature?
Matthieu
- [abinit-forum] ep coupling for potassium, Kim Duckyoung, 10/18/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] ep coupling for potassium, matthieu verstraete, 10/18/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] ep coupling for potassium, Matteo Giantomassi, 10/18/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] ep coupling for potassium, Kim Duckyoung, 10/18/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] ep coupling for potassium, Kim Duckyoung, 10/18/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] ep coupling for potassium, matthieu verstraete, 10/18/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] ep coupling for potassium, Kim Duckyoung, 10/18/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] ep coupling for potassium, matthieu verstraete, 10/18/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.