Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] Help with symmetry finder

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] Help with symmetry finder


Chronological Thread 
  • From: PGanesh <pganesh@ciw.edu>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Help with symmetry finder
  • Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:08:26 -0400


I rotated the axes, so that the coordinates now read as follows:

typat 1 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4

acell     13.0 13.0 13.0  #value here shouldn't affect symmetry
rprim     -0.5 0.5 0.5
           0.5 -0.5 0.5
           0.5 0.5 -0.5
              
xred      0.5 0.5 0.5
          1. 1. 0.5
          0. 0. 0.
          0.5 0.5 0.
          0. 0.25 0.25
          0.25 0. 0.25
          0.25 0.25 0.0
          0.5 0.75 0.25
          0.75 0.5 0.25
          0.75 0.75 0.0

ABINIT now gives a spacegroup of Imm2 (instead of Pmm2), which is again not what I expect.  If my coordinates are right, but ABINIT recognises the spacegrp incorrectly,  I assume it is going to affect the rest of the calculations.  So I would really like to get the coordinates right.  Any suggestions will be very helpful.

Thank you very much.

Ganesh


Michel Cote wrote:
5B0A5E0B-3270-4CC1-94CD-DC2F1616ADC3@umontreal.ca" type="cite">
Le 07-10-22 à 12:11, PGanesh a écrit :

No, I am not using "chkprim" in my input.  The primitive unit cell should have 10 atoms, and I have 10 atoms in the rock-salt pattern.  there is no warning in the output file.

Michel Côté:  "If you want to simulate the Fm-3m structure, you will have to input the cubic cell."

Just for my own clarification, you probably mean that I should use an rprim as:

rprim:  -0.5 0.5 0.5
            0.5 -0.5 0.5
            0.5 0.5 -0.5

and choose a single value for "acell", right? I will try that.



Yes and the xred should be 0.0 0.0 0.0 and 0.5 0.5 0.5 if the structure is rock-salt.

Michel




Thanks,
Ganesh

Xavier Gonze wrote:
767D99ED-9105-45D7-B818-0E178AE8E627@pcpm.ucl.ac.be" type="cite">
Dear Ganesh, 

Then, you have likely disabled the ability of ABINIT to complain about the unit cell not being
primitive , see the input variable chkprim
http://www.abinit.org/Infos_v5.4/input_variables/vargs.html#chkprim
At least ABINIT has likely sent you a warning ...
Did you set chkprim to 0 ?
Xavier


On 22 Oct 2007, at 17:50, Michel Cote wrote:

Hello Genesh,

I think Abinit does not recognize the cubic Fm-3m structure (#225) because your input describe a tetragonal structure (#25). Abinit symmetry subroutine cannot reduce the given unit cell to find the "optimal" unit cell. Probably FINDSYM can do that. If you want to simulate the Fm-3m structure, you will have to input the cubic cell.

Michel Côté



Le 07-10-22 à 08:02, P. Ganesh a écrit :


The values for the 3rd and 4th atom are:

0.0 0.0 0.00
0.0 0.0 0.50

Sorry about the misprint in my email (I was also trying for tetragonal distortions as well and hence the mixup).  But the problem remains the same.  ABINIT does not recognise the now corrected coordinates to be Fm-3m (or recognise it to be I4mm with the distortion of 0.01 in reduced coordinates of the 3rd and 4th atom as entered below).   Findsym recognises them to be so if I select them to be I centered.

Thanks,

Ganesh





Xavier Gonze wrote:
Dear Ganesh,

The input below is definitely NOT Fm-3m.
One does not need a computer code to see this ... atoms 3 and 4 are NOT at a symmetric position.
You must have given another input to FINDSYM ?!
Or perhaps you have given a tolerance of more than one percent to FINDSYM ?!?

Xavier


On 21 Oct 2007, at 20:43, P. Ganesh wrote:

I am having trouble with getting ABINIT to give the right space group!!

For example,  if I give the coordinates (listed below) into the "FINDSYM" program (it is known to be a reliable source to find symmetries.  one can google it) and select 'I' centering I get the correct space-group I want (since I worked out the co-ords.), Fm-3m (#225).  But ABINIT finds the spacegroup to be Pmm2 (#25) . So why doens't ABINIT recognise the spcgrp. to be #225 ?  Do I need to shift the origin to get the centering correct? I am not using any symmetry variable, system is non-magnetic.
Thank you in advance for any suggestions.

Ganesh


typat 1 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4

acell     7.09 7.09 14.18
rprim     1.0 -1.0 0.0
         1.0 1.0 0.0
         0.0 0.0 1.0

xred      0.0 0.5 0.25
         0.0 0.5 0.75
         0.0 0.0 0.01
         0.0 0.0 0.51
         0.25 0.25 0.0
         -0.25 0.25 0.0
         0.0 0.0 0.25
         0.25 0.25 0.5
         -0.25 0.25 0.5
         0.0 0.0 0.75






_____________________________________
Michel Cote
Departement de physique
Universite de Montreal





_____________________________________
Michel Cote
Departement de physique
Universite de Montreal






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page