Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: Re: [abinit-forum] shear stress using conventional cell?

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: Re: [abinit-forum] shear stress using conventional cell?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: wlu7910@126.com
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: Re: [abinit-forum] shear stress using conventional cell?
  • Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:33:32 +0100

Dear Anglade Pierre-Matthieu,
Thank you very much for you rapidly response.
About 1)I read some papers (eg. APL 91,031906, 2007). They can get the
stress for a different strain. In Abinit output file, I find that there are
stress tensors that diagonalized,but which value is the stress of the cell?
Did your answer previously mean that the stress of the cell is equal
(-pressure). Forgive me that my English understanding is not satisfying.
About 3) Do you mean that the pressure should be equal for primitice cell
and conventional cell if the calculation is convergent? Can you tell me how
to set the shiftk for conventional cell? When I test the convergence through
increasing "kptrlen", I should omit the "ngkpt",right? if shiftk should be
omitted also by using "kptrlen".
Thank you very much again for your time.

Best Wishes,
WLu

Hi,

1)About your first question:
The usual relation between the stress tensor and the pressure are fulfilled
by Abinit output.

2)I think it is possible to compute the strain with the conventional cell by
applying rotation matrix to your strain or to your cell.

3) The relationship between your two computed stress is likely the big word
of Abinit calculations: CONVERGENCE. You are witnessing effects of
convergence. Your ecut seems perfectly converged (I have small study of
Abinit pseudo for Al here:
http://anglade.googlepages.com/anglade-abinit-hands-on.pdf). So likely your
k-point mesh is not converged enough. You mention that the shift you use are
the same. Yet the cells are different so the sampled k-points are
different... By the way I think that this convergence test you perform is
very well suited for the kind of calculation you want to do. You just have to
increase "kptrlen" up to finding the same values for pressure in your two
cells.

Regards

PMA


On Nov 22, 2007 6:26 AM, <wlu7910@126.com> wrote:

Dear all,
I am a newer to ABINT. I want to ask if the pressure given in the *.out
file is equal to (-stress)?
Another question is that I want to calculate the shear stress for a series
of strains along the direction eg. (111)<1 -1 0>. But I don't know how to add
this kind strain to the primitive vector (for example fcc). what I know now
is to redefine the structure of the original fcc structure (cleave plane
(111) with surface vector [ 0.5 -0.5 0] and [0.5 0.5 -1], and the third
direction is perpendictular with (111)), then add small strain to the third
direction along [0.5 -0.5 0] direction. Now I meet a problem, If I can use
the conventional cell to get the stress of the distorted structure in ABINIT?
I use the tutorial structure of Al (still keep fcc structure without
distortion)with lattice constant 7.8 bohr (do not optimization)to test the
stress in primitive cell and conventional cell, respectively. The result of
these pressures are [Pressure= - 5.6996E+00 GPa] and [Pressure= -6.9105E+00
GPa] (ecut=20 H and shiftk is same for the two tests). So what's the
relationship of the pressure calcuated in primitive cell and conventional
cell?

Thank you very much for your help!

Best Regards,
WLu




  • Re: Re: [abinit-forum] shear stress using conventional cell?, wlu7910, 11/22/2007

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page