Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - RE: [abinit-forum] Predicting TSS

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

RE: [abinit-forum] Predicting TSS


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Shultz, Jack" <JShultz@nas.edu>
  • To: <forum@abinit.org>
  • Cc: <marzari@mit.edu>
  • Subject: RE: [abinit-forum] Predicting TSS
  • Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:36:25 -0500

Nicola,

I am reading your article "Simulation of Heme Using DFT + U: A Step
toward Accurate Spin-State Energetics" Do you recommend Quantum-Espresso
distribution as an open source solution for modeling transition states?

I'm sure if it was a turn-key solution someone would have solve many
problems already. For now I can only hope to get an idea on what I need
to learn.

Best regards,

Jack


-----Original Message-----
From: Nicola Marzari [mailto:marzari@mit.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 3:29 PM
To: forum@abinit.org
Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Predicting TSS

Shultz, Jack wrote:
> Nicola,
>
> I looked at some of the research described on your website. Is the
> Hubbard approach to augment DFT the same thing as DFT+U? I'm also
trying
> to find out what is meant by a nodal surface is that how you describe
> the environment of an enzyme?
>
> Jack


Hi Jack,

let me reply to the mailing list - apologies if others are not
interested. Hubbard / DFT+U are the same thing, in this context.

For a review, I personally like the Cococcioni/de Gironcoli PRB of 2005,
for the insight on U being a linear-response property - but
you should really look at the early papers by Anisimov, Andersen,
Lichtenstein that introduced the method.

The nodal surface is the locus of points where the many body
wavefunction goes to zero - QMC often uses the one from DFT,
but if the one from DFT is not good (e.g. the wrong symmetry)
than there is little that QMC can do to improve such bad start.
This is much more of a problem in transition-metal complexes, where
the ordering of states that have significant d (or f) orbital
components can be incorrect in LDA/GGA/B3LYP, and then QMC would
struggle to get a good energy starting from the locus of zero
amplitude for the many body wavefunction constructed from a set of
single particles orbitals that are not really the good ones.

As you can see, it can be very deeply technical - just wanted to
highlight that it's not a topic where DFT (or even QMC) gives us a
turnkey solution.

nicola



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Prof Nicola Marzari Department of Materials Science and Engineering
13-5066 MIT 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge MA 02139-4307 USA
tel 617.4522758 fax 2586534 marzari@mit.edu http://quasiamore.mit.edu




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page