forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: "Anglade Pierre-Matthieu" <anglade@gmail.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] about wavelets
- Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:46:29 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=NZ2YrqlCQgvpezIlx+VaVvEAArXZJdgHkn3A3xYoeGuzpQuSzDJ5Gq1Eyrs0106Nuz7El95OLxcn/U1pqQkpqb2Y+fUnClugiRuWBGypq9I+AaWeXsLE408EbbFO7SHTJtjlEW1mBEk83qYJcElBaquH+hfEUh7Rlec+a20CAnw=
Hi,
Sorry to get back to you so late. Its hard to find time to work on holidays with a cute son as mine hanging on your neck...
As you noticed atomic positions can be important since they appear to be (potentialy) the source of your problem. Also it's much more easy to have them if anyone is going to try to reproduce the error you get.
It is all the more important in your case as all other parameters are unchanged from the values from the automated tests...
In the present case I'm afraid that, even with the right atomic position I'm still not able to reproduce the bug you mentionned. I've taken the HGH pseudopotentials for Ge and Te. Abinit/BigDFT 5.5.1 is just running fine on your input file.
Which pseudopotential are you using ?
REgards
PMA
On Dec 30, 2007 4:08 PM, Durgun Engin <
Engin.Durgun@ulg.ac.be> wrote:
Dear Pierre-Matthieu,
I`d like to thank you for your response. I thought that the postions of
atoms would be irrelevant so that I did not attach them.
I tried the input files in bigdft directory and they ran without error.
When I just change the positions of atoms keeping everyhing same it gives
an error message. (which is same as the previous one)
iter Etot(hartree) deltaE(h) grdnorm vres2mklocl_wavelets: Create local potential from ions.total ionic charge, leaked charge -39.999999999997 0.000E+00
----------------------------------------------------------- Ionic
Potential Creation
ion-ion interaction energy 1.12808588314481E+02PSolver, free BC, dimensions: 137 137 137 proc 1 ixc: 0 ...The input file (which is same as t05.in in bigdft) is below. It works for
subroutine f_poissonsolver: problem of allocation of array zmpi2
the positions with "#"(the positions in the example) but it does not for
the other (my positions). I tried different cell dimensions, switch on/off
symmetry, metallic occupation, shift the atoms... but none of them works.Best wishes
Thank you in advance and happy new year.
Engin
nstep 20
acell 3*10
ecut 10
kpt 0 0 0
natom 8
nband 20
nkpt 1
nsym 1
ntypat 2
rprim 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
# symrel 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
toldfe 1.0d-4
typat 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
xcart
2.5 2.5 2.5
7.5 7.5 2.5
2.5 7.5 7.5
7.5 2.5 7.5
7.5 2.5 2.5
2.5 7.5 2.5
2.5 2.5 7.5
7.5 7.5 7.5
#0 0 0
#2.192 0 0
#1.437623199004281621 1.044494393323724765 0
#1.437623199004281621 -1.044494393323724765 0
#-0.6546356874363436925 0 1.40387076211977058
#-0.6546356874363436925 0 -1.40387076211977058
#2.788500000000000132 0 1.033168306714835246
#2.788500000000000132 0 -1.033168306714835246
znucl 32 52
usewvl 1
iscf 2
optstress 0
optforces 0
wvl_hgrid 0.5
icoultrtmt 1
nscforder 14
wvl_nprccg 5
--
Pierre-Matthieu Anglade
- Re: [abinit-forum] about wavelets, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 01/03/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] about wavelets, Durgun Engin, 01/04/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] about wavelets, Damien Caliste, 01/09/2008
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [abinit-forum] about wavelets, Damien Caliste, 01/03/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] about wavelets, Durgun Engin, 01/04/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.