forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Scott Beckman <spbeckman@gmail.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] A problem about the cell optimization
- Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 11:06:09 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=EUncizrsFnhZOkIKRipD3o/o2OoB3aqLGesufUdZ72uVwCG7wicyXFkj8QeZvuFPSmqWC+T1RLpxSijbPEetClKG95jWsjTEhby0IL5vZtWDu6z6qcy1YwpHrMW+m90stC6Gx41X9g9NgzyC2Z2+dJoivd58ECDx7sHbDpz/8MQ=
Hi,
If the two procedures result in two different structures then you may be accidentally forcing one of the calculations into a high symmetry solution.
I'd suggest that you compare both the energy difference between the two structures as well as the symmetry.
On Jan 8, 2008, at 4:13 AM, hyello25@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Abinit users:
Another question confused me fo ra long time. May need your help again.
When I do the cell optimizetion, I first modify nuclear position (optcell=0), then do full optimization of cell geometry(optcell=2). Is it right?
And if dont't use optcell=2(full optimization of cell geometry), after I modify nuclear position(optcell=0), for optimization of volume only(optcell=1) and constant-volume optimizationof cell geometry(optcell=3), which one I should do first? (I try both, the results are different. )
Best Regards,
!-----------------------!
G.R Qian
Physics Dept. NJU CN
!------------------------!
- A problem about the cell optimization, hyello25, 01/08/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] A problem about the cell optimization, Scott Beckman, 01/08/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.