forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: "Anglade Pierre-Matthieu" <anglade@gmail.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] optimal lattice parameter (acell1)
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:07:19 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=xsTmpoWaLzbGuSEhNK/dETA975h226ATomu50qs2Ewl+iEwyj7H6/AOO2WZsdB4QPR+OUT08PtyjrS+Qo1VKylXxHyKJK8tmLBgPEEar2R4U0I7fJpuInxy2liR5AS8HBOi6voZAIXV5SMU5FlFbpbbqL+HLzGBSEKUVKIaXNFQ=
Hi,
Could you please show your output file too ?
From your input I guess that Abinit understands your cell as having three atoms:
0.1250 0.1250 0.1250 #Mg -> Mg
0.8750 0.8750 0.8750 #Mg -> Al
0.5000 0.5000 0.5000 #Al -> O
Plus all atoms created from your spgroup input. Yet likely not the expected ones.
Obvisouly I can mistake...
Best
PMA
On Jan 20, 2008 5:26 PM, <
bagher_193@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Dear ABINIT user
When I calculate the optimal lattice parameter of MgAl2O4. The final results are:
acell1=1.261705782E00Bohr
acell2=1.2619705475E00Bohr
However, I can not figure out this number compare to input acell=15.231199Bohr for MgAl2O4.
I wonder, if possible, could someone let me know what is the problem, I appreciated for your reply
Best Wishes
Bagher
The input file is as followers:
ndtset 2
optcell 1
ionmov 3
ntime 10
dilatmx 2.0
ecutsm 0.5
kptopt 1
nshiftk 4
shiftk 0.5 0.5 0.5
0.5 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.5 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.5
ngkpt1 2 2 2
getwfk -1
spgroup 227
brvltt -1
acell 3*15.231199
ntypat 3
znucl 12 13 8
natom 14
natrd 3
typat 1*1 1*2 1*3
xred
0.1250 0.1250 0.1250 #Mg
0.8750 0.8750 0.8750 #Mg
0.5000 0.5000 0.5000 #Al
0.5000 0.7500 0.7500 #Al
0.7500 0.7500 0.5000 #Al
0.7500 0.5000 0.7500 #Al
0.2632 0.2632 0.2632 #O
0.7367 0.7367 0.7367 #O
0.7367 0.5132 0.5132 #O
0.2632 0.9867 0.9867 #O
0.9867 0.9867 0.2632 #O
0.5132 0.5132 0.7367 #O
0.5132 0.7367 0.5132 #O
0.9867 0.2632 0.9867 #O
ecut 30.0
nstep 40
toldfe 1.0d-6
diemac 12.0
--
Pierre-Matthieu Anglade
- optimal lattice parameter (acell1), bagher_193, 01/20/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] optimal lattice parameter (acell1), Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 01/21/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.