Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - question about high tolwfr before RF calculation

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

question about high tolwfr before RF calculation


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "hyello25 Qgrui" <hyello25@gmail.com>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: question about high tolwfr before RF calculation
  • Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:11:40 +0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=jcdwLCIAfR/KI81Skf/uBJgqU8pwrOkRakfJzHagg334u2xdhqM9ELe2GXoyVWeqF/hPyQx4EwTwhbmDJQEvbSF3Goe23PMZMJdgfzwapZSkIFGt7lW3Zr4ZzpEteRbiD8bEgs8+YhxRn8FOMmiEABG1On+jJ8FJBqJpWxxdHhI=

Dear abinit users,

In the document file of abinit of the parameter 'tolwfr':
"Note that the preparatory GS calculations before a RF calculations must be highly converged.
Typical values for these preparatory runs are tolwfr between 1.0d-16 and 1.0d-22."


While in my calculation of a complex system "Ba2ZnNb2O9", I could not to reach such stringent precision.
After about 100 steps to run a GS calculation,  the output file gives:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 scprqt:  WARNING -
  nstep=  100 was not enough SCF cycles to converge;
  maximum residual=  2.826E-07 exceeds tolwfr=  1.000E-18

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So can anyone give me some suggestions how to treat this situation. Need I to do a more accurate structure optimize?

Thanks in advance.
Bests.


G.R. Qian
Physics Dept.
NJU  CN



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page