Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] Deviation from LAPW

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] Deviation from LAPW


Chronological Thread 
  • From: TORRENT Marc <marc.torrent@cea.fr>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Deviation from LAPW
  • Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:38:52 +0100
  • Organization: CEA-DAM

Dear Chol-Jun,

You could try with PAW "pseudopotentials" (you can find Rd and Pd in Abinit PAW tables).
PAW always gives results to be compared with (FP)LAPW...

Marc Torrent



Chol-Jun Yu a écrit :
Dear users,

I would like to ask about the pseudopotential parameter file of Rh and Pd. Using the Rh3 and Pd1 GGA potential,(http://lorax.chem.upenn.edu/Research/psp_gga.html#Rh3) I obtained the results close to experimental values with respect to the lattice constant and bulk modulus of their fcc crystals with ABINIT code (Ecut=30ha, kpoints=(10,10,10), ixc=11:PBE GGA). However, the results are deviated from the LAPW values (Wien2k);

lattice constant (A) | Bulk modulus (Gpa)
----------------------------------------------------
| Exp. LAPW PP-PW | Exp. LAPW PP-PW
-------------------------------------------------
Rh3 | 3.803 3.832 3.806 | 270 260 262
Pd1 | 3.891 3.940 3.880 | 180 174 186

Is it possible to make the results of PP-PW close to LAPW rather than
experimental values? If possible, could you provide the generating
parameter file.

Thanks a lot in advance.
Chol-Jun




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page