Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - RE : [abinit-forum] A question about GW calculation of a metalic alloy Ga4P3Ti

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

RE : [abinit-forum] A question about GW calculation of a metalic alloy Ga4P3Ti


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "BRUNEVAL Fabien 201177" <fabien.bruneval@cea.fr>
  • To: <forum@abinit.org>
  • Subject: RE : [abinit-forum] A question about GW calculation of a metalic alloy Ga4P3Ti
  • Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:04:15 +0100

Dear Thanusit,

Please don't consider the values of the gaps output by abinit. In fact, this
functionality often doesn't work, especially for metals. You should rather
calculate the gaps on your own, using the last column of the GW results.

If you don't mind, I have some comments about your GW calculation:
1) Make sure that you have a pseudopotential for Titane that leaves the
semicore states 3s 3p as valence states. GW method is very sensitive to that
issue.
2) It is usually a good strategy to keep ecutwfn = ecutsigx, since the cost
of the calculation is driven by the maximum of these two values.

Enjoy the GW!

Fabien





-------- Message d'origine--------
De: thanusit@kku.ac.th [mailto:thanusit@kku.ac.th]
Date: sam. 2/9/2008 11:36
À: forum@abinit.org
Objet : [abinit-forum] A question about GW calculation of a metalic alloy
Ga4P3Ti

Dear Abinit users

I tried to calculate the GW corrections(using plasmon pole model) for a
metallic alloy Ga4P3Ti. In a convergence test of the GW corrections at Gamma,
I got the results as shown below. Please note the E0 values. The calculation
was done using Abinit 5.4.3., both Parallel and sequencial version. Results
are the same.

-------------------------------------------
Perturbative Calculation

k = 0.000 0.000 0.000
Band E0 <VxcLDA> SigX SigC(E0) Z dSigC/dE Sig(E) E-E0 E
36 0.145 -12.115 -8.696 0.484 0.893 -0.120 -8.628 3.487 3.632
37 0.913 -9.582 -3.039 -2.806 0.925 -0.081 -6.125 3.457 4.370

E^0_gap 0.000
E^GW_gap 3.487
DeltaE^GW_gap 3.487
-------------------------------------------

From the ground state band calculation, there is a clear separation between
band 36 and 37. I wonder why "E^0_gap" is reported "0.000", instead of
0.768eV (equals to 0.913-0.145 eV).

I looked through the "occ" variables. They indicate that, for this metalic
alloy, band 36 is half-filled while band 37 is empty. Does the above result
have anything to do with the half-filled metalic character?

Regards,

Thanusit Burinprakhon


##Input Files##

ndtset 15

# Calculation of the Self-Energy matrix elements (GW corrections)

optdriver 4
getkss 1
getscr 1
nband 80

##variable for convergence test
ecutwfn: 5.0
ecutwfn+ 5.0

ecutsigx 10.0
nkptgw 1
kptgw 0.0 0.0 0.0
bdgw 36 37

ecut 100
acell 3*10.5056
rprim 1.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 1.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 1.0
ntypat 3
znucl 22 15 31
natom 8
typat 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3
xred
0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00
5.0000000000E-01 5.0000000000E-01 0.0000000000E+00
5.0000000000E-01 0.0000000000E+00 5.0000000000E-01
0.0000000000E+00 5.0000000000E-01 5.0000000000E-01
2.5979480250E-01 2.5979480250E-01 2.5979480250E-01
2.5979480250E-01 7.4020519750E-01 7.4020519750E-01
7.4020519750E-01 2.5979480250E-01 7.4020519750E-01
7.4020519750E-01 7.4020519750E-01 2.5979480250E-01

nstep 100
diemac 12.0
nsym 0
symmorphi 0
ixc 7
iscf 5
prtvol 1

<<winmail.dat>>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page