forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: "Anglade Pierre-Matthieu" <anglade@gmail.com>
- To: xiangsitian@163.com, forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: Re: Re: problem about space group
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:58:54 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=qItKZfMWNHwQhXYgzrSQbMGSERBm5ephG1NRkKoYuU/V2qkhHP2yDhfxmrnoQ4oFjIHssLgNhIOmf/t2xXk+tHOKCpVsAlCIvYZbiM8bzL2X+ugVr28sjDbOZWcbRiwlzCooMHG/pbDOkgLwbpISzkKefGYE+ZB+ZeP3cGNZ0aM=
Hi,
Your mail is not at all a problem (however, it would be better to communicate this to the forum, in case we make some errors, someone could point it out ...). In fact This morning, I was just working on some lecture about space groups, etc.
The problem for me is that I can not check (no time I have to ready a lecture that start in 30 mn) your atomic postions. I might find some time to do it this evening. Why don't you make the calculation of atomic positions by hand ? Wouldn't it be more reliable ? Suppose your program do not make the same choice I do to build the primitive cell. It would make all your coordinate wrong... Could you try by hand and tell me the results. If it doesn't work I will try it for you in order to double check.
Anyway, I think that the only problem you get if Abinit can not find the symmetries of your system is a longer calculation. The real problem would be Abinit finding a higher symmetry than expected.
regards
PMA
2008/3/26 <xiangsitian@163.com>:
Dear Anglade;I am very sorry to trouble you again.My input files is as follows:#Definition of the unit cellacell 9.9003 20.5848 9.55450.55608134293663447 -0.5000000000 0.49684492849824241
rprim
-0.44391865706336553 0.5000000000 0.49684492849824241
0.44391865706336553 0.5000000000 -0.49684492849824241#Definition of the k-point gridsnshiftk 1
shiftk 0.5 0.5 0.5 # These shifts will be the same for all grids
ngkpt 3 3 3#Definition of the atom types-0.215000 0.215000 0.500000
ntypat 3
znucl 39 73 8
#Definition of the atoms
natom 12
typat 2*1 2*2 8*3
xred
-0.476000 0.476000 0.000000 #Y
0.262000 0.738000 -0.500000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 #Ta0.107500 0.407500 0.058900-0.081800 0.718200 -0.064000 #O
0.745100 0.761100 -0.560800
0.482800 1.142800 -0.559000
-0.407500 -0.107500 -0.058900
-0.718200 0.081800 0.064000
-0.761100 -0.745100 0.560800
-1.142800 -0.482800 0.559000
#Definition of the planewave basis set
ecut 40#Definition of the SCF proceduretoldfe 1.0d-7
nstep 50
diemac 2.0The above I used is primitive cell.First I use material studio to bulid conventional cell,then convert it to primitive cell. I use abinit to calculate for a short time.From out.files I found the space group is P1.This is wrong. Is xred correct in the input file? Can you send me your input file?Thank you very much.
--
Pierre-Matthieu Anglade
- Re: problem about space group, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 03/25/2008
- Message not available
- Re: Re: problem about space group, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 03/26/2008
- Message not available
- Re: Re: Re: problem about space group, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 03/26/2008
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Re: Re: Re: problem about space group, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 03/27/2008
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Re: problem about space group, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 03/26/2008
- Message not available
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.