Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - [abinit-forum] Martins2abinit code and spin-orbit coupling for lead

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

[abinit-forum] Martins2abinit code and spin-orbit coupling for lead


Chronological Thread 
  • From: <maurosgroi@yahoo.it>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: [abinit-forum] Martins2abinit code and spin-orbit coupling for lead
  • Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:04:24 +0200

Dear Abinit users,

I'm trying to generate TM pseudopotentials including spin-orbit interaction
for
Pb using the Martins2abinit code downloaded from the web site.

The input file for the atom code is:

pg Lead PRB 54 2937 (1996)
tm2
n=Pb c=pwr
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
13 2
6 0 2.00 0.00
6 1 2.00 0.00
3.18 3.18

which should be the same used in the article "Stability of NanPb (n <= 7_)
clusters: A first-principles molecular-dynamics study" by Luis Carlos Balbás
and José Luís Martins (but wiht the PW functional).
I've produced also a psedudopotential for the GGA-PBE funtional.

Here is the first pat of the obtained pseudo in the abinit format:

Psp for Lead PR (LDA=pw - fully relativ.) using Improved Troullier and
Martins method (from JL Martins psp generator)
82. 4.00 080307 : zatom,zion,pspdat
5 7 1 0 1055 0.0 :
pspcod,pspxc,lmax,lloc,mmax,r2well
2.233614498626119E-04 1.250000000000000E-02 2 : aa,bb,pspso
0 0. 0. 1 3.176472 : l=1,e99.0,e99.9,nproj,rcpsp
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 : rms,ekb1,ekb2,epsatm
1 0. 0. 2 3.176472 : l=2,e99.0,e99.9,nproj,rcpsp
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 : rms,ekb1,ekb2,epsatm
1 0. 0. 2 3.176472 : l=2,e99.0,e99.9,nproj,rcpsp
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 : rms,ekb1,ekb2,epsatm
0.0 0.0 0.0 : rchrg,fchrg,qchrg
0 =l for pseudopotential
-1.7631231942344E+00 -1.7631231941348E+00 -1.7631231940327E+00
-1.7631231939279E+00 -1.7631231938205E+00 -1.7631231937104E+00
-1.7631231935975E+00 -1.7631231934817E+00 -1.7631231933630E+00
-1.7631231932413E+00 -1.7631231931166E+00 -1.7631231929886E+00
-1.7631231928574E+00 -1.7631231927230E+00 -1.7631231925850E+00
-1.7631231924436E+00 -1.7631231922987E+00 -1.7631231921500E+00
-1.7631231919976E+00 -1.7631231918413E+00 -1.7631231916812E+00
.......

I've checked the convergence in ecut and k-point grid (finding a good ecut
value of 30 Ha and standard k-point grid composed by 60 points). My problems
start when I try to optimize the cell parameter: the BFGS optimizer finds an
unrealistic cell parameter (for example 6.5 bohr instead of 9.4).

Here is my input file for the LDA-PW fuctional:

# Lead crystal

# Simulation parameters
ecut 30
ixc 7
occopt 7
tsmear 0.01
nband 8

# Cell description
acell 3*9.36
rprim
0.0 0.5 0.5
0.5 0.0 0.5
0.5 0.5 0.0
ntypat 1
znucl 82
natom 1
typat 1
xred
0.000 0.000 0.000
nspinor 2
so_psp 2

# Cell optimization
ionmov 3
optcell 1
tolmxf 5.0d-6
ntime 50
dilatmx 1.15
ecutsm 0.5

# K-points
ngkpt 8 8 8
kptopt 1
nshiftk 4
shiftk
0.5 0.5 0.5
0.5 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.5 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.5

# SCF procedure
nstep 100
toldfe 1.0d-10
iscf 5

I got the same WARNINGS in the log file:

vtorho : WARNING -
For k-point number 56,
The minimal occupation factor is 0.029.
An adequate monitoring of convergence requires it to be at most 0.01_dp.
Action : increase slightly the number of bands.

and:

BROYDEN STEP NUMBER 2
------------------------------------------------------

findmin : WARNING -
The 2nd degree equation has no positive root (choice=4).

findmin : COMMENT -
Will continue, since the new total energy is lower
than the old. Take a larger step in the same direction.
line minimization, algorithm 4
lambda etotal dedv d2edv2
old point : 0.0000E+00 -3.7185833891E+00 -8.4061E-03 2.3612+159
new point : 1.0000E+00 -3.7272202744E+00 -8.7001E-03 2.3240-297
predicted point : 2.5000E+00 -3.7410409248E+00 0.0000E+00 4.8481-308

At the end of the calculation the optimised acell is 6.5 bohr.

Can someone suggest a way to solve my problem?
What I'm missing or where I'm wrong?
Thanks a lot and best regards,
Mauro Sgroi.
Centro Ricerche FIAT.
Italia.



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page