forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: "Davide Sangalli" <davide.sangalli@gmail.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: [abinit-forum] Ultrasoft pseudo-potential and abinit
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:00:02 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=D1YLS7a87UYIrJGVMxjjKlETsZons1QGcfj9oaxOu5T8vCZFnTr0fKVg7OFTW52i9yUpqg6QmxZnkhHtC50Hz0b+iqJGNc1Ty5A1pAnVkr92k3n+QBVMWTswU1sm44lCeTUmhUyv4MyybyYJ+oV6P5mQmyR4nJLMysZeI6xpua0=
Dear forum,
I'm trying to compare the speed of abinit versus some
other DFT code and I realized that other codes which uses
ultra-soft pseudo-potential are faster than abinit.
Anyway, from what I undestood, using PAW one should be
able to have performances like "DFT ultrasoft codes"
if the starting point for the computation is a converted ultrasoft.
I tryed to use the PAW atomic data table from the abinit website:
http://www.abinit.org/PAW/MAIN/PAWTable.html
but unfortunately they are not suited for spin polarized calculations.
So two questions:
- Can I use PAW for spin polarized calculations?
- Using PAW are there particularly drawbacks with respect to the
standard pseudo-potential methods?
Thanks. Best regards,
Davide
- [abinit-forum] Ultrasoft pseudo-potential and abinit, Davide Sangalli, 04/16/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] Ultrasoft pseudo-potential and abinit, TORRENT Marc, 04/16/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] Ultrasoft pseudo-potential and abinit, Natalie Holzwarth, 04/16/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.