forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: "Anglade Pierre-Matthieu" <anglade@gmail.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] cell optimisation
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 11:59:46 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=E741xdt+Vu0pESZqU4k5cIZgdwYoQ8P2whpbjc8OVFVwniaPCI0qM5Lm264BbZ2v2QgtpDaa06vwnIvRkqyfC56LjI8vUrvuTT6n4c8bYrK31JyYxrjkj4wKiMwCmVynFYCRPSZdl0uyVGd7bwHXe3s873WdP7AYwyNe65UgHZk=
Hi,
If I understand correctly you are using the exact same structure in both case
?
The only difference being the use of variables needed by the cell
optimization in one case ?
For instance you are likely using ecutsm ?
If everything preceding is correct, is it possible that your cutoff
energy is not converged ? Or at least and more precisely that the
stress is not converged with respect to the cutoffenergy to 5e-6
Ha.bhr^-3 ?
In this case it would be a nice explanation for your problem and you
would have to check again the level of convergenc you had with respect
to ecut and k-point and perform again your optimization if the
pressure you want is really of the order ot 1e-3 GPa. Or you can just
keep using the same ecutsm knowing that your calculation is not
perfectly converged ...
regards
PMA
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Manuel Pérez Jigato
<Manuel.PerezJigato@fys.kuleuven.be> wrote:
> Dear all
>
> after computing the optimal volume/lattice constant of a rock-salt oxide for
> a fixed k-point set and planewave cut-off energy,
>
> 1- if i then carry out a total energy calculation for the optimal lattice
> constant
> 2- and if i start the volume/lattice constant optimisation starting from the
> same
> optimal lattice constant
>
> in both cases i get completely different stress: please see numbers below
>
> let me ask, is the difference explained by the absence of the cut-off
> smoothing
> in the total energy calculation, and that is used during cell optimisation
>
> thanks
>
> Manuel Perez Jigato
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 1- total energy calculation
>
> Cartesian components of stress tensor (hartree/bohr^3)
> sigma(1 1)= 4.90452484E-05 sigma(3 2)= 0.00000000E+00
> sigma(2 2)= 4.90452484E-05 sigma(3 1)= 0.00000000E+00
> sigma(3 3)= 4.90452484E-05 sigma(2 1)= 0.00000000E+00
>
> -Cartesian components of stress tensor (GPa) [Pressure= -1.4430E+00
> GPa]
> - sigma(1 1)= 1.44296084E+00 sigma(3 2)= 0.00000000E+00
> - sigma(2 2)= 1.44296084E+00 sigma(3 1)= 0.00000000E+00
> - sigma(3 3)= 1.44296084E+00 sigma(2 1)= 0.00000000E+00
>
>
> 2- cell-optimisation
>
> Cartesian components of stress tensor (hartree/bohr^3)
> sigma(1 1)= 1.25262834E-07 sigma(3 2)= 0.00000000E+00
> sigma(2 2)= 1.25262834E-07 sigma(3 1)= 0.00000000E+00
> sigma(3 3)= 1.25262834E-07 sigma(2 1)= 0.00000000E+00
>
> -Cartesian components of stress tensor (GPa) [Pressure= -3.6854E-03
> GPa]
> - sigma(1 1)= 3.68535934E-03 sigma(3 2)= 0.00000000E+00
> - sigma(2 2)= 3.68535934E-03 sigma(3 1)= 0.00000000E+00
> - sigma(3 3)= 3.68535934E-03 sigma(2 1)= 0.00000000E+00
>
>
> Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
>
>
--
Pierre-Matthieu Anglade
- [abinit-forum] cell optimisation, Manuel Pérez Jigato, 05/16/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] cell optimisation, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 05/16/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.