forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: "Anglade Pierre-Matthieu" <anglade@gmail.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] convergence test
- Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 21:55:46 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=b3gE+apnsLZNs7sJMuW95nGWJ+/9oiJADw77vpt9Gf3LBB1uLfB3Ce3XUdhCIsXlGYxE1jDuH8dJhjz8Dp/9XxrfnQJ0kQAtGe/7y5wc2SszfBo1a0SyeWlGURuHGoCOzUaZAAf/HEQc1Ol2pgxLf9A+nE9Ldoxe5PKnfqKO5T4=
Let's analyse your output :
The SCF convergence is OK
much more than 3-6 atoms
awfully high forces (~1 Ha.bohr^-1)
We won't make the convergence test over ecut and k-point but we shall
assume you did.
So 2 solutions :
1) Start from something closer to stability if possible
(looks like there is a problem along x and z axis) could it be an
error in the input ?
2) Try a safer (yet slower) algorithm
ionmov 1
optionally try to increase "vis" and to reduce "dtion" if the total
energy do not decrease.
regards
PMA
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 8:33 PM, ghada ameereh <ghaddosh@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Dear sir:
> the attached input and output files are above. i did
> optimisation for atomic position in this input as a
> first step.and here i get a lack of convergence.
>
> best wises.
> gada
> --- Anglade Pierre-Matthieu <anglade@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> It looks like you forgot your input/output file.
>>
>> If you are sure of the cutoff energy and k-smapling
>> convergence, and
>> if the SCF cycles converges correctly for all your
>> optimisation it is
>> possible that the optimization algorithms of Abinit
>> are not
>> efficiently dealing with your problem. This may
>> happens when your
>> system is either too far away from relaxation or
>> have too muche
>> degrees of freedom.
>> In the second case it is always recommended to start
>> by optimizing
>> only the atomic position before any structural
>> relaxation.
>> In the other cases the best could be to use damped
>> molecular dynamic.
>> Although slow, as long as the step size is small
>> enough it can lead
>> you close to the ground state.
>>
>> regards
>>
>> PMA
>>
>> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 4:32 PM, ghada ameereh
>> <ghaddosh@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > dear abinitor:
>> > i want to calculate electronic properties of
>> > Ni4SiGe3.but in optimization output file we get
>> lack
>> > of convegence (Etot changes continuously ), the
>> input
>> > ,output and psp files are attached.(i began the
>> > optimization with orthorhombic lattice
>> structure).if
>> > you have any information about this problem please
>> > send me and i will appreciate that for you.
>> >
>> > gada
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Pierre-Matthieu Anglade
>>
>
>
>
>
--
Pierre-Matthieu Anglade
- [abinit-forum] convergence test, ghada ameereh, 05/19/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] convergence test, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 05/19/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] convergence test, ghada ameereh, 05/19/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] convergence test, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 05/19/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] convergence test, ghada ameereh, 05/19/2008
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [abinit-forum] convergence test, ghada ameereh, 05/19/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] convergence test, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 05/19/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.