forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: "lan haiping" <lanhaiping@gmail.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] wffile.F90 files
- Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 14:32:53 +0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Q4P5bvlEudNoAZe21L7Bnf2RNDbhV9AucLYpd2fIwpaLxFrpfukEHp3GrOqUJ+2yQjp5Yt5p7owdH3g0uDqzk6bQJHi5RaPIdOBgOuyg21g9nQjA9ThTb0EOM/F+6O9NchDNb/6ZmaVXG8SgamKiTWnZsqC+X/5rfSsovrFpw0Y=
Hi,
based on my little knowledge of abinit src code, fofr(1,:,:,:,:) is the real part of wavefunction, not the coefficient.
You may confirm it from last part of wffile.F90, since the density is just written as fofr*fofr.
best
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:44 AM, <zyzhang@pub.iams.sinica.edu.tw> wrote:
dear users:
In the file ' wffile.F90 ' , " fofr(:,n1,n2,n3) " is the output data of
_WFK file after using cut3d .fofr(1,n1,n2,n3) = real part , fofr(2,n1,n2,n3) =
imaginary part
the comment in this program says the fofr(:,n1,n2,n3) is the wavefunction.
I wonder that fofr is value of wavefunction on each grid point in real space
or
coefficient of planewave on each reciprocal lattce G ???
I have obfuscation with these two things for a long time.
which statement is correct?? Thank you all
best regards
--
Hai-Ping Lan
Department of Electronics ,
Peking University , Bejing, 100871
lanhaiping@gmail.com, hplan@pku.edu.cn
- [abinit-forum] wffile.F90 files, zyzhang, 06/02/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] wffile.F90 files, lan haiping, 06/02/2008
- [abinit-forum] super cell howto?, Toby D. Young, 06/04/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] super cell howto?, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 06/04/2008
- [abinit-forum] super cell howto?, Toby D. Young, 06/04/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] wffile.F90 files, lan haiping, 06/02/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.