forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
Re: [abinit-forum] Metallic systems: choice of tsmear in the absence of a (tsmear=0)-reference
Chronological Thread
- From: Nicola Marzari <marzari@mit.edu>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Metallic systems: choice of tsmear in the absence of a (tsmear=0)-reference
- Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 18:30:26 +0800
- Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Dear Max,
it seems all very good and reasonable, but if phonons is what you are
after, I'd go for a more stringent test on kpoints/smearing (as a side
note - if the quantities you are interested in were to depend only
on the Fermi surface, you'd need much tigher convergence tests).
Since phonons are what you are looking for, just displace one or
more atoms (by 5% on their interatomic distances, say), and
repeat the test, until forces are converged to your desired
tolerance (I'd say 2-3 cm-1 in the phonon frequencies).
nicola
Latévi Max LAWSON DAKU wrote:
Dear Abinit users,
I would like to study a family of related metallic systems.
For the one with the simplest molecular formula (6 atoms
in the formula unit), I tried to do a convergence study in
order to determine the optimal value of tsmear (cold
smearing; occopt=5).
1) Without smearing, I did full geometry optimisation with
nkpt = 10, 28, 60 and ecut values of 20, 30, 40, 50 Ha
(and an additional test optimisation with nkpt=60 and
ecut=80). For this FCC system, this gives "converged"
values of acell=7.260 angstrom and Etot=-167.260 Ha.
The "(tsmear=0)-convergence" in acell (> 0.001 A) is
obtained for ecut=40 Ha and nkpt=28.
2) With ecut set to 40 Ha and smearing turned on, I made
vary tsmear at fixed values of nkpt (10 pts -> circles;
28 pts -> squares; 60 pts -> diamonds). The attached
figures gives the dependences of acell and Etot on
tsmear. For tsmear <= 0.01 Ha, acell=2.589 A and
Etot=-167.266 Ha; independantly of the integration
grid used. The curves are actually similar in the studied
range.
3) Given these results, I would go with a tsmear value of
4 mHa and nkpt=10 for the determination of the bulk
modulus and its derivative, and also of the phonons.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Prof Nicola Marzari Department of Materials Science and Engineering
13-5066 MIT 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge MA 02139-4307 USA
tel 617.4522758 fax 2586534 marzari@mit.edu http://quasiamore.mit.edu
- [abinit-forum] Metallic systems: choice of tsmear in the absence of a (tsmear=0)-reference, Latévi Max LAWSON DAKU, 08/05/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] Metallic systems: choice of tsmear in the absence of a (tsmear=0)-reference, Nicola Marzari, 08/05/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] Metallic systems: choice of tsmear in the absence of a (tsmear=0)-reference, Latévi Max LAWSON DAKU, 08/05/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] Metallic systems: choice of tsmear in the absence of a (tsmear=0)-reference, Nicola Marzari, 08/05/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.