forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Rafael Dias Menezes <rdmeneze@yahoo.com.br>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: [abinit-forum] problem in convergency in ionic optmization
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.br; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=rTNwu7y63+HtOddy6Mscg4RQm9RZ0o1WCSYn+xyNjA4BWH3Qu96GfPmIf/xSKn51FealtvHYIhM9L876tqnrxtlGNK+Nz9VbsGSSrANF5YphWZK1S82KFti6CYJNlNTWjxLKSdWNLMNSR5bg5qNeFy7Qp2kKtgrsAdMar0Yrl3Q=;
Dear All,
I starting to use 'ab-initio' calculations now, and I think that in the the
start of this research is normal to get any problems.
I am studing some silicon nanowires structures. I already done some
calculations to get the best x, y and z acell parameters.
Now, I have my best acell parameters and I would like to get the better
atomic positions to my structure in that cell.
I trying to relax a silicon nanowire structure but the stop criterious is
never met. I don't know why, but analyzing the total energy I noted that the
energy always swings between tho limiting values.
In the last days I was thinking that the system isn't semiconductor. To get a
different test, now I am doing a calculation setting tsmear and occopt
variables to 600 K and 7, respectively. But, analyzing the intermediary
results I noted the same behavior that I noted last week. Now I don't know
what I have to do.
If somebody would help me, I'll very happy.
Maybe the sequence of work is wrong.
thanks,
Rafael Dias
Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo - Brazil
Novos endereços, o Yahoo! que você conhece. Crie um email novo com a
sua cara @ymail.com ou @rocketmail.com.
http://br.new.mail.yahoo.com/addresses
- [abinit-forum] problem in convergency in ionic optmization, Rafael Dias Menezes, 09/18/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.15.