forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Fabien Bruneval <fabien.bruneval@cea.fr>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: RE : [abinit-forum] parallel calculation for GWA
- Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:44:44 +0200
Dear Tieyu,
I guess you are running out of memory.
Your system has 60000 PW and as you use the default "kssform 1", Abinit tries to allocate a 60000x60000 Hamiltonian matrix...
Try to learn how to use "kssform 3" that avoids the full diagonalization of the hamiltonian.
Fabien
mailoliver wrote:
Dear Fabien:
I use abinis to calculate beta-SiC 64 atoms supercell with cubic structure and only one kpoint(0 0 0).But it still could not write complete KSS file. And there are message:
forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
Image PC Routine Line Source
abinis 0816FACF Unknown Unknown Unknown
abinis 0812C955 Unknown Unknown Unknown
abinis 080A3236 Unknown Unknown Unknown
abinis 0805E230 Unknown Unknown Unknown
abinis 08052E51 Unknown Unknown Unknown
abinis 0804BA45 Unknown Unknown Unknown
abinis 08049A4A Unknown Unknown Unknown
libc.so.6 555F0E80 Unknown Unknown Unknown
abinis 08049971 Unknown Unknown Unknown
Input and log files are in attachment. Could you give me more advice?
Best
Tieyu
?2008-10-05,"BRUNEVAL Fabien 201177" <fabien.bruneval@cea.fr> ??:
>Dear Tieyu,
>
>Good that you could reproduce the published numbers!
>You should know that, by now, the production of KSS files is not compatible
with the parallelism over bands and FFTs.
>In principle, you can generate the KSS file using only the "old"
parallelisation over k-points. So I would advise to remove from your input file all the
keywords related to fft_opt_lob, nbdblock etc...
>
>By the way, your k-point grid is not regular? or your supercell is not cubic?
>
>Bye.
>
>Fabien
>
>
>
>-------- Message d'origine--------
>De: mailoliver@163.com [mailto:mailoliver@163.com]
>Date: dim. 10/5/2008 11:15
>À: forum@abinit.org
>Objet : [abinit-forum] parallel calculation for GWA
> >Dear all:
>
>I try to repeat the GWA results of beta-SiC in PRB 78, 085125 (2008). I can
get
>the similar results for the system, which include only two atoms. But when I
>try to run supercell with 64 atoms, I could not get KSS file. I find the
>processes are static. Is the file too large, and ifort could not write it?
Or
>maybe I make som mistakes.
>
>Best,
>
>
>Tieyu >
>I compile abinit-5.6.0 with mpich-ifort.9.0, and run abinip with 8
processors.
>
>
>my input file:
>*******************************************
>ndtset 3
>
># Dataset1: usual self-consistent ground-state calculation
># Definition of the k-point grid
>kptopt1 1 # Option for the automatic generation of k points,
>ngkpt1 8 8 1
>nshiftk1 1
>shiftk1 0. 0. 0. # These shifts will be the same for all grids
># Definition of the SCF procedure
>toldfe1 1.0d-6 # Will stop when this tolerance is achieved on total
energy
>prtden1 1 # Print out density
>
># Dataset2: calculation of kss file
># Definition of k-points
>kptopt2 0 # K-points will be provided
>nkpt2 1 # Take only 1 k-point:
>kpt2 0.0 0.0 0.0 # the Gamma point
>istwfk2 1 # Option needed for special k-points like Gamma
># Definition of the SCF procedure
>iscf2 -2 # Non self-consistent calculation
>getden2 1 # Read previous density file
>tolwfr2 1.0d-16 # Still get it converged
>nband2 280
>
># Definition of parameters for the calculation of the kss file
>nbandkss2 480 # Number of bands in KSS file (the maximum possible)
>wfoptalg2 4
>nbdblock2 8
>fft_opt_lob2 2
>fftalg2 401
>
># Dataset3: Calculation of the screening (epsilon^-1 matrix)
>optdriver3 3
>getkss3 -1
>nband3 480
>ecutwfn3 3.6
>ecuteps3 6.0
>ppmfrq3 16.7 eV
>gwpara3 2
>.........
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[??] ??????26??? <http://popme.163.com/link/004584_1007_8510.html>
- [abinit-forum] parallel calculation for GWA, mailoliver, 10/05/2008
- RE : [abinit-forum] parallel calculation for GWA, BRUNEVAL Fabien 201177, 10/05/2008
- RE : [abinit-forum] parallel calculation for GWA, ธนูสิทธิ์ บุรินทร์ประโคน, 10/07/2008
- Re: RE : [abinit-forum] parallel calculation for GWA, Fabien Bruneval, 10/07/2008
- RE : [abinit-forum] parallel calculation for GWA, ธนูสิทธิ์ บุรินทร์ประโคน, 10/07/2008
- Re:RE : [abinit-forum] parallel calculation for GWA, mailoliver, 10/07/2008
- Re: RE : [abinit-forum] parallel calculation for GWA, Fabien Bruneval, 10/07/2008
- RE : [abinit-forum] parallel calculation for GWA, BRUNEVAL Fabien 201177, 10/05/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.15.