Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - [abinit-forum] Definition of rprim

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

[abinit-forum] Definition of rprim


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Anindya Roy" <royanin@gmail.com>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: [abinit-forum] Definition of rprim
  • Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:17:09 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=tBoKK66uVvatHi5/P+FIv1QLNOhy1600uiOtEJv1WhVxEfuXpakYi4ekdwfixg2axp 4I8AhNavoxK1iMU2NUuYIEWSNwuOUSHilLU61DljF9FAT3hQ4fK62/Fl/Fmn2VVRiGQo 0IH03GcmqngiFMxW9VWj4CHIKzwjgwtYCytkE=

Hi all,

I'm having a little trouble to interpret the basic definition of
'rprim' as stated in documentation of version 5.5.4 (and similar
ones): rprim is defined to be "...in columnwise entry, the three
dimensionless primitive translations in real space."

Later the example given for hexagonal lattice:

"rprim 0.86602540378 0.5 0.0
-0.86602540378 0.5 0.0
0.0 0.0 1.0

that can be avoided thanks to angdeg:

angdeg 90 90 120
"

It looks to me that new basis vectors are in row wise entry, rather
than column wise.

So if we assume that the new vector R_1 is [rprim(11)\hat{x} +
rprim(12) \hat{y} + rprim(13) \hat{z}] , then it's internally
consistent how xred and xcart are converted among themselves. Am I
missing something obvious? Your thought will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Anindya Roy
Graduate student
Rutgers University, USA



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.15.

Top of Page