forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Bernard Amadon <bernard.amadon@cea.fr>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] about the PAW+U
- Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 14:37:38 +0100
Dear Qian Guangrui,
Concerning the first two points,
(1) If you do not use spin orbit coupling, nspinor=1, in the other case nspinor=2.
In the case where you want to use spin orbit coupling, you then use non-collinear magnetism,
and thus you have to precise the direction of the imposed magnetisation with the variable spinat
(see http://www.abinit.org/Infos_v5.6/input_variables/vargs.html#spinat). For NiO, and to my knowledge
nspinor=1 is fine.
If you do not use spin orbit AND you impose the density matrix, spinat is not very useful, because the magnetisation
will be imposed by the starting density matrix.
(2) In some cases, it can appear that a given density matrix does not lead to convergency.
You can then choose another starting density matrix. Note the precise order of d-orbitals (see
http://www.abinit.org/Infos_v5.6/input_variables/varpaw.html#dmatpawu). For example note that
the five columns for the input density matrix are xy,yz,z2,xz,x2-y2 (so t2g t2g eg t2g eg).
The filling of orbitals depends on the geometry, so I cannot easily check your input density matrices without the
full input.
Best
Bernard Amadon
hyello25@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi, everyone
I am now doing some calculations of PAW+U, I met some problems.
(1) I am not so sure about the variable 'spinor', examples V5#8 & V5#16 give
different 'spinor' for NiO. I am confused which one is more reasonable? Is
the
value of this variable not very important? While we should care more about
whether it is positive or negative?
For example, supposed in ferromagnetic spin-polarized system NiMnO3 , (
Ni(+2), Mn(+4), O(-2)), we can give the the specific dmatpawu, with nsppol=2,
nspinor=1, nspden=2, what dose the 'spinat' should be set?
dmatpawu # The initial density matrix
# Mn atom 1 (spin-up )
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
# Mn atom 1 (spin-down )
1.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 1.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000
#-----------------------------------------------------------------------#
# Mn atom 2 (spin-up )
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
# Mn atom 2 (spin-down )
1.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 1.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000
#-----------------------------------------------------------------------#
# Ni atom 1 (spin-up )
1.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 1.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 1.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000
# Ni atom 1 (spin-down )
1.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 1.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000
#-----------------------------------------------------------------------#
# Ni atom 2 (spin-up )
1.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 1.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 1.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000
# Ni atom 2 (spin-down )
1.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 1.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000
#-----------------------------------------------------------------------#
(2) When I do some calculating some complicated systems with PAW+U, it is very
hard to get convergence in a scf process, sometimes 200 scf steps still dose
not work. How can I improve this?
(3) Is LSDA+phonon possible in ABINIT? If dose, is there any specific
conditions for the pseudopotentials ?
Thanks a lot in advance.
Bests,
Qian
-------------------------------------
Qian Guangrui
Graduated students
Physics Department
Nanjing University
Nanjing 210093 China
E-mail: hyello25@gmail.com
- [abinit-forum] about the PAW+U, hyello25, 11/27/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] about the PAW+U, Bernard Amadon, 11/27/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] about the PAW+U, hyello25 Qgrui, 11/28/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] about the PAW+U, Bernard Amadon, 11/27/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.15.