Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] YMnO3 AFM (anti ferromagnectic) optimization problem

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] YMnO3 AFM (anti ferromagnectic) optimization problem


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Vincenzo Fiorentini <vincenzo.fiorentini@dsf.unica.it>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] YMnO3 AFM (anti ferromagnectic) optimization problem
  • Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:01:00 +0100
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=PxskK2NrPAmR6/NNXnCp8cohKmbsq1RGUbKwwB0FnolGufxv++MYnWxiKapnz7x/qd Qj6ZbYarb6wuPkkmB7Uyr5DOQn7OSOaKNHygYrCu1uQ4OypQMD48UKDrIESCus24q7BU +2PtrGWW/1xWmoBTJhshi7PNR3yGYQ1QqhxdE=

Hi, I don't know if this has got to do with your error message, but note that LDA/GGA fail for YMnO (it is artificially metallic, as the cuprates, e.g. CuO, YBCO6, CaYCuO, etc.). You need SIC (better) or GGA +U (may be) for that. See B. Van Aken, T. M. Paalstra, A. Filippetti, and N. Spaldin, Nature Mater. 3, 164 (2004)

best - VF

On 12 Dec 2008, at 6:56 AM, Skorlans Mathew wrote:

Dear Users,

I am trying to optimize the lattice constant for cubic YMnO3 in Para, Ferro
and Antiferro phases. I could get nice optimization of acell for Para and Ferro
phases. But, When I tried to optimize the Antiferro phase, I got the following
error message: Intially, I tried to double the other Mn position, then tried to
increase by 50% for both cases i was getting same error. But When I gave the
following positions for Mn (which actually is not the correct one)
Mn 0.25 0.25 0.25
0.75 0.75 0.75
It works, I do not know why? Because these positions are not the correct ones.

Here is the ERROR message:

hkinp: ERROR -
When nsppol==1 and nspden==2, at least one of the symmetry operations
must be anti-ferromagnetic (symafm=-1), in order to deduce the spin-down
density
from the spin-up density.
However, it is observed that none of the symmetry operations is
anti-ferromagnetic.
Action : Check the atomic positions, the input variables spinat, symrel,
tnons, symafm.
In case your system is not antiferromagnetic (it might be
ferrimagnetic ...),
you must use nsppol=2 with nspden=2 (the latter being the default
when nsppol=2).

Please, let me know what is wrong with my input file given below:

# Optimization of latice constant for cubic YMnO3 with Spin polarized
#(Ferromagnetic) conditions
ndtset 1
#Optimization of the lattice parameters

optcell 1
ionmov 3
tolmxf 5.0d-4
dilatmx 1.1
ecutsm 0.5
nband 64
nsppol 1
nspden 2
nspinor 1
spinat 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 -4
0 0 4
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0

#Definition of the k-point grids
kptopt 1
nshiftk 1
shiftk 0.0 0.0 0.0
ngkpt1 6 6 6
getwfk -1

#Definition of the unit cell

acell 3*3.90 angstrom

rprim
1 0 0
0 1 0
0 0 1

#Definition of the atom types
ntypat 3
znucl 39 25 8
#ziontypat 11 15 6

#Definition of the atoms
natom 10
typat 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 # 1=Y 2=Mn 3=O
xred 0.00 0.00 0.00 #Y
0.25 0.25 0.25 #Y
0.50 0.50 0.50 #Mn
0.75 0.75 0.75 #Mn
0.50 0.50 0.00 #O
0.75 0.75 0.00 #O
0.50 0.00 0.50 #O
0.75 0.00 0.75 #O
0.00 0.50 0.50 #O
0.00 0.75 0.75 #O
#Definition of the planewave basis set
ecut 30.0
#Definition of the SCF procedure
nstep 500
toldfe 1.0d-6
diemac 2.0

Thanks and regards
SKORLANS K M (MS Student)
Dept.of Physics National Institute os technology India





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.15.

Top of Page