forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: "P. Ganesh" <pganesh@ciw.edu>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] constrained optimization
- Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:58:33 -0500
Dear Petr and Matthieu,
The rprim of my structure is:
1.0 1E-3 0.0
1E-3 1.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 1.0
This would give me a 'Cm' phase, while keeping the pseudocubic axis for cartesian coordinates.
I was planning to relax a superstructure with up to a 100 atoms. I don't know if I can get the full elastic tensor of this system, but would still be interested in knowing Petr's method.
Yes, it would be interesting to solve this problem. I will also give some more thought to this.
Thanks,
Ganesh
Petr wrote:
Hi,
I had the same problem as you. I have been doing some relaxation on the
monoclinic structure and I couldn't use the standard relaxation procedure. I
solved this problem by writing an own relaxation procedure which is relaxing
parameters RPRIM according to the computed elastic tensor. If you can be more
specific in detail I might by able to tell you if the same procedure can help
you.
Best regards
Ing. Peter Sestak
Institute of Physical Engineering
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Brno University of Technology
--
It is the very mind itself
That leads the mind astray;
Of the mind,
It is essential to lose it,
But, do not be mindless.
(The Unfettered Mind)
- [abinit-forum] constrained optimization, PGanesh, 12/17/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] constrained optimization, Petr, 12/20/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] constrained optimization, matthieu verstraete, 12/21/2008
- Re: Re: [abinit-forum] constrained optimization, Petr, 12/22/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] constrained optimization, P. Ganesh, 12/22/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] constrained optimization, matthieu verstraete, 12/21/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] constrained optimization, Petr, 12/20/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.15.