forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

{Spam?} Re[2]: [abinit-forum] ab initio vs. first principles.

From: Hongsheng Zhao <zhaohscas@yahoo.com.cn>
To: "asa aravindh" <mails2asa@gmail.com>
Cc: forum@abinit.org
Subject: {Spam?} Re[2]: [abinit-forum] ab initio vs. first principles.
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:10:56 +0800
Organization: Chinese Academy of Sciences

On Monday, December 22, 2008 at 12:03, mails2asa@gmail.com wrote:
> Dear Zhao..
> What I understood is there is no difference
> Both are synonyms
> Regards
> Asa

Thanks for all of the discussions and helps here, I've sorted it out
by and large. Thanks again.

Regards,
--
Hongsheng Zhao <zhaohscas@yahoo.com.cn>
Xinjiang Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry
Chinese Academy of Sciences
GnuPG DSA: 0xD108493
2008-12-22

[abinit-forum] ab initio vs. first principles., Hongsheng Zhao, 12/21/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] ab initio vs. first principles., Adam Sorini, 12/21/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] ab initio vs. first principles., asa aravindh, 12/22/2008
  - {Spam?} Re[2]: [abinit-forum] ab initio vs. first principles., Hongsheng Zhao, 12/22/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] ab initio vs. first principles., lan haiping, 12/22/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] ab initio vs. first principles., Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 12/22/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] ab initio vs. first principles., Josef Zwanziger, 12/22/2008