forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Xavier Gonze <xavier.gonze@uclouvain.be>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] ecutsm and electronic convergence
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 08:40:40 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=uclouvain.be; h=message-id:from: to:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version:subject:date:references; q=dns; s=selucl; b=ngv18jl pIfdIzojGY4Kit+jFtu19R3HcvcrIBTbmpnbA89Cb/PeuxnClvypwS5znfxTC1jC Np0aKn9fNN3y55Qfnsv1L0g5JiBFPz8gsBHeiBUpp2e7bNM7qyciL1NghrBZMD99 Ts9yET8fOXtSfURab6r5/YdGJlsdlyZq9NYc=
Dear Carl,
At least, you should not use the compiler Intel 10.0 : it is buggy.
You should switch to Intel 10.1 .
(Of course this does not mean that your problem is due to this).
And I do not understand why you combine 5.6.4 and 5.4.4...
Xavier
On 06 Jan 2009, at 22:34, greeff@lanl.gov wrote:
Sorry if this a repetition. I tried to post before, but I don't see that it
showed up. I was having a problem with convergence of the parallel code, and
saw this thread, so I did some tests of the ecutsm option. The result is that
there is an interaction of ecutsm /= 0 and wfotpalg = 4 that causes the
problem. The problem occurs with parallel over band/fft, parallel over k-pt,
and serial runs.
My test case is for bct Sn, using a homegrown PAW from the Holzwarth code. I am
using abinit version 5.6.4, except the serial tests use 5.4.4. The compiler is
intel 10.0.023 with openmpi. I can provide full input files if desired.
This table summarizes the results. The number of iterations given is what is
required for convergence with toldfe 1.0d-6. The entries with >n never
converged to this tolerance.
parallel ecutsm wfoptalg iter
band 1.0 4 >30
band 0.0 4 6
k-pt 1.0 4 >30
k-pt 0.0 4 6
k-pt 1.0 10 6
k-pt 0.0 10 6
serial 1.0 10 7
serial 1.0 4 >12
The last serial run needed me to set fftalg 401, which wasn't used in the other
serial run. (It was used in all the parallel runs).
Carl Greeff
- Re: Re: [abinit-forum] ecutsm and electronic convergence, greeff, 01/06/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] ecutsm and electronic convergence, Xavier Gonze, 01/07/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] ecutsm and electronic convergence, BOTTIN Francois, 01/07/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] ecutsm and electronic convergence, Emmanuel Arras, 01/07/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] ecutsm and electronic convergence, BOTTIN Francois, 01/09/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] ecutsm and electronic convergence, Emmanuel Arras, 01/07/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.15.