Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - [abinit-forum] Extreme difference in LDA versus GGA calculation of CrAs

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

[abinit-forum] Extreme difference in LDA versus GGA calculation of CrAs


Chronological Thread 
  • From: <ldamewood@gmail.com>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: [abinit-forum] Extreme difference in LDA versus GGA calculation of CrAs
  • Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:31:52 +0100 (CET)

I've been calculating the gap and magnetization in ZB CrAs using abinit. As a
reference, I've been comparing my calculations to Phys. Rev. B 67, 224420
(2003). When I preform an LDA calculation, I get good agreement with the
lattice parameter and magnetization. For the GGA calculation, I get a much
larger lattice parameter and a non-integer magnetization (an integer
magnetization would be expected for half metallic CrAs). Specifically, acell
should be 10.69 whereas GGA gives me 11.2. magnetization should be exactly 3
while GGA gives 2.95.

I've included an input below. Can anyone tell me if I am doing something
incorrectly? I'm not doing anything vastly different in my GGA calculation
than
in my LDA calculation so my guess is that the pseudopotential is not well
suited for this calculation. I'm new at this so any help is appreciated.

-Liam

----------------------------------------------------------
For LDA, I used the FHI pseudopotentials and for GGA, I used PBE from the FHI
code. Here is my input file for a GGA calculation for the acell convergence.

[damewood@**** CrAs_1]$ cat CrAs_1.in
ndtset 15
acell: 10.0 10.0 10.0
acell+ 00.1 00.1 00.1
rprim 0.0 0.5 0.5
0.5 0.0 0.5
0.5 0.5 0.0
ntypat 2
znucl 24 33
natom 2
typat 1 2
xred 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.25 0.25 0.25
nsppol 2
spinat 0.00 0.00 6.00
0.00 0.00 -3.00
nband 12

ecut 30.0

kptopt 1
ngkpt 27 27 27
nshiftk 4
shiftk 0.5 0.5 0.5
0.5 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.5 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.5

occopt 4
nstep 20
toldfe 1.0d-6
tsmear 0.01
prtdos 2



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.15.

Top of Page