forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Anurag Chaudhry <anuragchaudhry@yahoo.co.uk>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: [abinit-forum] spin polarized vs. no spin
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:33:15 +0000 (GMT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=OKj2MO+7Q9q+jpF89ob4gSGPsO568QNEZwrVvL5PwFUeYJJDgaaZF+CKa/qRlM+ux91BMrHrnCZDIBJl40b7hv7FiK5CasuBgLXQN4feMpVKxnRaXEbceNHeAPZA15Oa8G4dennqaJ6k5TxJxJ9viOU+oRjwPtbO6coE+mSxMTo=;
Hello Everyone,
I am have been running ABINIT to calculate the density of states for few Cerium doped insulators for some time now. In all calculations there is a single Ce ion sitting in a host supercell matrix (as a substitutional impurity). And all systems have an odd number of total electrons.
I have run calculations with no spin polarization for these systems. A typical total DOS has Ce 4f electron state inside the host bandgap, i.e., there is a gap between 4f and the valence band maximum (VBM). Recently I repeated a calculation (same goemetry and everything else same) except for spin polarization. Now the spin polarized DOS shows a different 4f - VBM gap.
The 4f for Ce has only 1 electron in the system the spin up and spin down differ by only 1 electron. I do not understand how spin polarization vs. no spin calculations should give different results for the filled 4f - VBM gap ?
Any suggestions/comments are welcome.
All calculations are with TM pseudopotentials. LDA and LSDA were used for no spin and spin polarized calculations.
I did the calculations for the same compound with VASP (PAW, PBE) and found that it gives the same 4f-VB gap for spin polarized as well as no spin calculations.
best regards,
Anurag
I am have been running ABINIT to calculate the density of states for few Cerium doped insulators for some time now. In all calculations there is a single Ce ion sitting in a host supercell matrix (as a substitutional impurity). And all systems have an odd number of total electrons.
I have run calculations with no spin polarization for these systems. A typical total DOS has Ce 4f electron state inside the host bandgap, i.e., there is a gap between 4f and the valence band maximum (VBM). Recently I repeated a calculation (same goemetry and everything else same) except for spin polarization. Now the spin polarized DOS shows a different 4f - VBM gap.
The 4f for Ce has only 1 electron in the system the spin up and spin down differ by only 1 electron. I do not understand how spin polarization vs. no spin calculations should give different results for the filled 4f - VBM gap ?
Any suggestions/comments are welcome.
All calculations are with TM pseudopotentials. LDA and LSDA were used for no spin and spin polarized calculations.
I did the calculations for the same compound with VASP (PAW, PBE) and found that it gives the same 4f-VB gap for spin polarized as well as no spin calculations.
best regards,
Anurag
- [abinit-forum] build netcdf library, kong, 01/16/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] build netcdf library, Alain Jacques, 01/16/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] build netcdf library, Lingzhu Kong, 01/18/2009
- [abinit-forum] spin polarized vs. no spin, Anurag Chaudhry, 01/19/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] spin polarized vs. no spin, matthieu verstraete, 01/19/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] spin polarized vs. no spin, Anurag Chaudhry, 01/19/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] spin polarized vs. no spin, matthieu verstraete, 01/19/2009
- [abinit-forum] spin polarized vs. no spin, Anurag Chaudhry, 01/19/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] build netcdf library, Lingzhu Kong, 01/18/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] build netcdf library, Alain Jacques, 01/16/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.15.