Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - [abinit-forum] relativistic GW

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

[abinit-forum] relativistic GW


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Manuel Pérez Jigato <Manuel.PerezJigato@fys.kuleuven.be>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: [abinit-forum] relativistic GW
  • Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:26:54 +0100

Dear all

is there any formal/consistency reason not to use a relativistic LDA/GGA ground
state (scalar relativistivistic / spin-orbit) previous to a GW quasiparticle correction? In the first-order perturbation expresion for the QP correction,
would you need a relativistic Sigma?

for instance, this would impose some limitations on whether scalar relativistic
pseudopotentials should be used for such applications...(probably relat-paw as well?)

regards

Manuel Pérez Jigato
KU Leuven

Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.15.

Top of Page