forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Xavier Gonze <xavier.gonze@uclouvain.be>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Error while reading gs wfk in rf calculation
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:02:12 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=uclouvain.be; h=message-id:from: to:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version:subject:date:references; q=dns; s=selucl; b=WSlHsVo 3soC7IQfQcUYBL8xjs0yx/2kM6eceIy16lueU8tnRzOq3OaDEmK2dQK5fN94N7JM APrkkINtjd5xcYuGuZaKQMhywP6h0LijZuWIRRj0bo0f7vmbVmBLhQN09lzemeEx 8sLrnhEK+bwB8crEsSyT+15ce7iuk5AX+Ugk=
Dear Igor Lukacevic,
On 17 Feb 2009, at 08:10, ilukacevic@fizika.unios.hr wrote:
Dear X. Gonze,
Yes (I've included an .in file in my first post, but forgot to reattach it in
the following posts - sorry for that), I'm using ecutsm, with the value of 0.1
Ha (the same one in structural relaxation and rf calc.). I haven't tried to
optimize its value...yet. Do You think its too low?
The recommended value is 0.5 Ha. 0.1 Ha seems low but perhaps sufficient. At least,
you should give a try with the recommended value (and use it consistently for geometry optimization
and rf calculations).
But I'm not using the same value of ecut in structural relaxation calc. (52 Ha)
and rf calc. (60 Ha).
Always better to be consistent. At least you should have done the generation of GS wavefunctions
for subsequent rf calculation with the 60 Ha value...
X. Gonze
Could this be the cause of the slow convergence?
I know that because of that I receive an difference in stress tensor components
between struct. relax. and rf calc.:
Cartesian components of stress tensor (hartree/bohr^3)Etotal= -7.21370977356432E+01
sigma(1 1)= -1.35956626E-03 sigma(3 2)= 0.00000000E+00
sigma(2 2)= -1.35956626E-03 sigma(3 1)= 0.00000000E+00
sigma(3 3)= -1.35956885E-03 sigma(2 1)= 0.00000000E+00
<-- struct. relax. calc.
-Cartesian components of stress tensor (GPa)[Pressure= 4.0000E+01 GPa]
- sigma(1 1)= -3.99998150E+01 sigma(3 2)= 0.00000000E+00
- sigma(2 2)= -3.99998150E+01 sigma(3 1)= 0.00000000E+00
- sigma(3 3)= -3.99998915E+01 sigma(2 1)= 0.00000000E+00
Cartesian components of stress tensor (hartree/bohr^3)Etotal= -7.21382669702764E+01
sigma(1 1)= -1.35946560E-03 sigma(3 2)= 0.00000000E+00
sigma(2 2)= -1.35946560E-03 sigma(3 1)= 0.00000000E+00
sigma(3 3)= -1.35776261E-03 sigma(2 1)= 0.00000000E+00
<-- rf calc.
-Cartesian components of stress tensor (GPa)[Pressure= 3.9980E+01 GPa]
- sigma(1 1)= -3.99968535E+01 sigma(3 2)= 0.00000000E+00
- sigma(2 2)= -3.99968535E+01 sigma(3 1)= 0.00000000E+00
- sigma(3 3)= -3.99467501E+01 sigma(2 1)= 0.00000000E+00
Could this be also the cause?
Thank You in advance!
Igor Lukacevic
- [abinit-forum] Error while reading gs wfk in rf calculation, ilukacevic, 02/11/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Error while reading gs wfk in rf calculation, matthieu verstraete, 02/11/2009
- Re: Re: [abinit-forum] Error while reading gs wfk in rf calculation, ilukacevic, 02/13/2009
- Re: Re: [abinit-forum] Error while reading gs wfk in rf calculation, matthieu verstraete, 02/13/2009
- Re: Re: Re: [abinit-forum] Error while reading gs wfk in rf calculation, ilukacevic, 02/16/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Error while reading gs wfk in rf calculation, Xavier Gonze, 02/16/2009
- Re: Re: [abinit-forum] Error while reading gs wfk in rf calculation, ilukacevic, 02/17/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Error while reading gs wfk in rf calculation, Xavier Gonze, 02/17/2009
- Re: Re: [abinit-forum] Error while reading gs wfk in rf calculation, ilukacevic, 02/17/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Error while reading gs wfk in rf calculation, Xavier Gonze, 02/16/2009
- Re: Re: Re: [abinit-forum] Error while reading gs wfk in rf calculation, ilukacevic, 02/16/2009
- Re: Re: [abinit-forum] Error while reading gs wfk in rf calculation, matthieu verstraete, 02/13/2009
- Re: Re: [abinit-forum] Error while reading gs wfk in rf calculation, ilukacevic, 02/13/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Error while reading gs wfk in rf calculation, matthieu verstraete, 02/11/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.15.