Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] imaginary dielectric function under strain

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] imaginary dielectric function under strain


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Anglade Pierre-Matthieu <anglade@gmail.com>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] imaginary dielectric function under strain
  • Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:13:25 +0100
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=BZAtZ7tIMltiLmbwNORFfRX+7le1DpzSiWrzsuR9cw+RmHL+r26cq9UeM3PttDltVr WPCqZYbI9cHRNUIH2/3druvipBo00vbKxdyPR2GvGsLJs+GXMUWlAYlRBoz66DMgGYzD O5Ux0pNt9KWcRhoaxlDBYVjL36kqIW3jJGZ4A=

> But, this question came to me if I have to keep the volume of the unit cell
> constant even if I have starin in "c" parameter in order to calculate the
> imaginary part of dielectric function?!
>

It really depends on the kind of results you are seeking.
- If you want to simulate a fix volume transformation with 1% of
compression of the c axis, you are perfectly right ;
- if you want to simulate an uniaxial load you'll relax the stress in
the a and b directions ;
- if you want to simulate a strained cristal within a hard rigid
matrix you won't keep a constant volume and use unchanged values for a
and b ;
- ...
No one can tells you ; it's you to decide.

regards,

--
Pierre-Matthieu Anglade



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.15.

Top of Page