forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
Re: [abinit-forum] why large deviation from experiment with spin-orbit coupling
Chronological Thread
- From: "Aldo Humberto Romero" <aromero@qro.cinvestav.mx>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Cc: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] why large deviation from experiment with spin-orbit coupling
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:47:37 -0600 (CST)
- Importance: Normal
I agree with Matt, you should a problem on the pseudo... did you
look at the logout to see if the spin-orbit is properly
included? which pseudo did you use?
The other code you can use the include SO correction is the
Martin's code. You can follow the link in
http://www.abinit.org/Psps/?text=psps
Be sure that convergence is Ok, it is much expensive but
at least, our experience shows that usually, this correction improves
the results.. Hf is not the exception :-)
regards
-aldo.
> It probably is the pseudopotential. Where did you get the one with SO, if
> it's not an HGH?
>
> Matthieu
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:36 AM, <tomblister@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>> I'm doing the optimization calculation of Hf with spin-orbit coupling,
>> but
>> the
>> result crystal parameters deviate from the experiment wildly. without
>> considering the spin-orbit interaction, the results are way better. i
>> suppose
>> spin-orbit calculation with hgh pseudopotential would be more accurate,
>> so
>> what's the possible mistake in my calculation? following is my input
>> file
>> for
>> reference:
>>
>> ########################
>> #intxc 1
>> istwfk 1
>> nspinor 2
>> so_psp 2
>> #######################
>> #Definition of occupation numbers
>> occopt 6
>> tsmear 0.01
>> strprecon 0.001
>> #nsppol 2
>> #tphysel 0.0001
>> tolmxf 1.0d-6
>> #Definition of the unit cell
>> acell 5.8100225016E+00 5.8100225016E+00 9.1898541450E+00
>>
>> angdeg 90 90 120
>>
>> #Optimization of the lattice parameters
>> optcell 2
>> ionmov 2
>> ntime 100
>> dilatmx 2.0
>> ecutsm 0.5
>>
>> #Definition of the atom types
>> ntypat 1 # There is only one type of atom
>> znucl 72 # The keyword "znucl" refers to the atomic number of
>> the
>> # possible type(s) of atom. The pseudopotential(s)
>> # mentioned in the "files" file must correspond
>> # to the type(s) of atom. Here, the only type is
>> Iridium
>>
>> nband6 36
>> #Definition of the atoms
>> natom 2 # There is only one atom per cell
>> typat 1 1 # This atom is of type 1, that is, Iridium
>> xred # This keyword indicate that the location of the atoms
>> # will follow, one triplet of number for each atom
>> 1/3 2/3 1/4
>> 2/3 1/3 3/4
>>
>> #Definition of the planewave basis set
>>
>> ecut 85
>>
>>
>> #Exchange-correlation functional
>> ixc 1 # LDA Teter Pade parametrization
>>
>> #Definition of the k-point grid
>> #kptopt 1 # Option for the automatic generation of k points,
>> taking
>> # into account the symmetry
>> ngkpt 12 12 8 # This is a 2x2x2 FCC grid, based on the primitive
>> vectors
>> nshiftk 1
>>
>>
>>
>> shiftk 0.0 0.0 0.5
>>
>> #Definition of the SCF procedure
>> nstep 100 # Maximal number of SCF cycles
>> toldfe 1.0d-7 # Will stop when, twice in a row, the difference
>> # between two consecutive evaluations of total energy
>> # differ by less than toldfe (in Hartree)
>> #Print electronic density of states document
>> #prtdos 1
>>
>
>
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Dr. Matthieu Verstraete
>
> European Theoretical Spectroscopy Facility (ETSF)
> Dpto. Fisica de Materiales,
> U. del Pais Vasco,
> Centro Joxe Mari Korta, Av. de Tolosa, 72, Phone: +34-943018393
> E-20018 Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain Fax : +34-943018390
>
> Mail : matthieu.jean.verstraete@gmail.com
> http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~mjv500
>
---------------------------------------------------
Prof. Aldo Humberto Romero
CINVESTAV-Unidad Queretaro
Libramiento Norponiente 2000
CP 76230, Queretaro, QRO, Mexico
tel: 442 211 9909
fax: 442 211 9938
email: aromero@qro.cinvestav.mx
aldorome@gmail.com
www: qro.cinvestav.mx/~aromero
- [abinit-forum] why large deviation from experiment with spin-orbit coupling, tomblister, 03/12/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] why large deviation from experiment with spin-orbit coupling, matthieu verstraete, 03/12/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] why large deviation from experiment with spin-orbit coupling, Aldo Humberto Romero, 03/12/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] why large deviation from experiment with spin-orbit coupling, matthieu verstraete, 03/12/2009
- Re: Re: [abinit-forum] why large deviation from experiment with spin-orbit coupling, tomblister, 03/12/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] why large deviation from experiment with spin-orbit coupling, matthieu verstraete, 03/12/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] why large deviation from experiment with spin-orbit coupling, Aldo Humberto Romero, 03/12/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] why large deviation from experiment with spin-orbit coupling, matthieu verstraete, 03/12/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.15.