forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: <hichem.bouderba@gmail.com>
- To: Marc.TORRENT@cea.fr, forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: RE : [abinit-forum] about Calcium PAW
- Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 09:43:48 +0200 (CEST)
thanks Alain and Marc...
Marc:
"If you tried Ca PAW datset delivered in abinit/tests/Psps_for_tests
directory..."
yes that's the one I tried.
and Alain:
it's exactly the input file in the atompaw web site ( I only tried LDA).
even, I was surprised to see that the log derivatives in logdrirv.2 don't
match
exactly.
I don't have the input and output files right now but I'll try to post them
later.
Actually, I have chosen the paw in the package because it was in the package
and I took it as a target as an exercice. I have generated several Ca PAW but
I was always slightly underbinding ( a greater optimized FCC cell parameter)
with respect to it. and as the package PAW was closer to the all electron
calculations (wien2k) in the litterature I concluded that, as expected, it's
my
PAW that should be improved.
thanks.
- [abinit-forum] about Calcium PAW, hichem.bouderba, 05/04/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] about Calcium PAW, Alain Jacques, 05/04/2009
- RE : [abinit-forum] about Calcium PAW, Marc.TORRENT, 05/04/2009
- Re: RE : [abinit-forum] about Calcium PAW, hichem.bouderba, 05/05/2009
- Re: Re: RE : [abinit-forum] about Calcium PAW, hichem.bouderba, 05/06/2009
- Re: RE : [abinit-forum] about Calcium PAW, hichem.bouderba, 05/05/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.15.