forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Xavier Gonze <xavier.gonze@uclouvain.be>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Problem with automatic generation of k-points
- Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 20:33:44 +0200
Dear Xenohpon,
See doc/release_notes/release_notes_v5.8.html , WARNING A.1 and A.2 (likely the latter) .
X.
On 18 Jul 2009, at 17:17, Xenophon Krokidis wrote:
The space group is P1: Symmetries : space group P1 (# 1); Bravais aP (primitive triclinic)
I am using exactly the same input for both versions of ABINIT so therefore I believe that there should not be any problem related with precision which could give this different result.
Xenophon
Xenophon Krokidis, PhD
Scienomics
T: + 33 (0)1 40 07 56 60
F: + 33 (0)1 71 19 75 83
M: + 33 (0)6 76 68 06 47
matthieu verstraete wrote:
<Xenophon_Krokidis.vcf>
what space groups are detected? You are probably seeing a difference
in symmetry due to small "errors" in the acell or xred. This would
mean 5.8.3 is more difficult for symmetry recognition, which it
normally shouldn't be. Try checking all the xred for last-digit errors
(eg 0.205 symmetric of 0.8 instead of 0.795)
Matthieu
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 5:02 PM, <xenophon.krokidis@scienomics.com> wrote:
I am working both with ABINIT 5.6.4 and ABINIT 5.8.3. For the structure given
below (see input file) the two versions of ABINIT give different k- points when
the automatic generation of the best k-point grid is selected. ABINIT 5.4.6
gives 6 and ABINIT 5.8.3 gives 14. Several OS have been tried (Windows/Vista,
Linux RH, OpenSuse, Fedora and 32bit vs 64bit).
Any ideas, explanations are more than welcome !
# test
acell 5.0557 6.9684 6.1975 Angstr
angdeg 90.1725 89.9883 55.884
chkprim 0
ecut 500 eV
ionmov 2
ntime 200
tolmxf 0.0005
nkpt 0
kptopt 1
nstep 50
ixc 11
nband 40
nsppol 1
natom 20
nsym 1
symrel 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
ntypat 4
occopt 1
ecutsm 1.0
strtarget 0 0 0 0 0 0
dilatmx 1.1
optcell 2
prtden 1
toldff 0.0000001
typat 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
xred 0.514506 0.517578 0.337544
0.354529 0.65856 0.149121
0.543363 0.523401 0.948735
0.429453 0.418779 0.837167
0.589942 0.278259 0.647364
0.401054 0.412616 0.448164
0.321035 0.887354 0.165817
0.625195 0.0490203 0.661742
0.792921 0.505765 0.898215
0.152579 0.428644 0.397331
0.722061 0.497055 0.381453
0.220395 0.441001 0.880055
0.819528 0.25585 0.644386
0.554285 0.85897 0.171695
0.192376 0.999226 0.0304452
0.191765 0.978743 0.310754
0.753587 0.958288 0.80614
0.392761 0.076104 0.666813
0.756119 0.937023 0.526133
0.124522 0.681636 0.145734
znucl 7 6 8 1
- [abinit-forum] Problem with automatic generation of k-points, xenophon.krokidis, 07/16/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem with automatic generation of k-points, matthieu verstraete, 07/18/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem with automatic generation of k-points, Xenophon Krokidis, 07/18/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem with automatic generation of k-points, Xavier Gonze, 07/18/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem with automatic generation of k-points, Xenophon Krokidis, 07/18/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem with automatic generation of k-points, Xavier Gonze, 07/18/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem with automatic generation of k-points, Xenophon Krokidis, 07/18/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem with automatic generation of k-points, matthieu verstraete, 07/18/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.