forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Xenophon Krokidis <Xenophon.Krokidis@scienomics.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] PAW parallel calculation remains idle
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:15:36 +0200
- Organization: Scienomics
Title: Signature text
Dear Francois, I followed Emannuel's and your recommendations and I still get problems. I summarize below: Using the input (see below) I get a message saying that only Gamma points should work and that I need to give istwfk 1. Giving this option allows the calculation to run however in output it is reported that all 30 bands are treated by node 0. So the question is am I running parallel on bands or FFT ? Moreover, reading the http://www.abinit.org/documentation/helpfiles/for-v5.8/input_variables/varpar.html#paral_kgb I found the following (which makes me think that in PAW case kgb parallelization doesn't work, is this correct ?): The keywords wfoptalg=4, nloalg=4, fftalg=401, intxc=0, and fft_opt_lob=2 have to be used for a band/FFT/k-point parallelisation. Spin-polarized ( nsppol=2 or nspden=2) as well as PAW method calculations are now allowed in production in the framework of band/FFT/k-point parallelisation. Best regards, Xenophon # pALA-paw paral_kgb 1 npband 6 wfoptalg 14 # keywords for kgb parallelization nloalg 4 fftalg 401 intxc 0 fft_opt_lob 2 strprecon 0.1 acell 4.601012 7.043279 6.411174 Angstr angdeg 89.847876 89.911537 62.696451 chkprim 0 ecut 15 Hartree ecutsm 0.5 Hartree pawecutdg 45 Hartree ionmov 2 ntime 200 tolmxf 0.00005 kptrlen 20.0 nkpt 0 kptopt 1 ngkpt 1 1 1
BOTTIN Francois wrote: 4A6980E9.2030203@cea.fr" type="cite">Dear Xenophon, |
begin:vcard fn:Xenophon Krokidis n:Krokidis;Xenophon org:Scienomics adr:;;17 square Edouard VII;Paris;;75009;France email;internet:Xenophon.Krokidis@Scienomics.com title:Managing Director tel;work:+33 (0)1 53 43 51 05 tel;fax:+ 33 (0)1 53 43 92 92 tel;cell:+33 (0)6 76 68 06 47 version:2.1 end:vcard
- [abinit-forum] PAW parallel calculation remains idle, xenophon.krokidis, 07/24/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] PAW parallel calculation remains idle, Emmanuel Arras, 07/24/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] PAW parallel calculation remains idle, Xenophon Krokidis, 07/24/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] PAW parallel calculation remains idle, BOTTIN Francois, 07/24/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] PAW parallel calculation remains idle, Xenophon Krokidis, 07/24/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] PAW parallel calculation remains idle, BOTTIN Francois, 07/24/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] PAW parallel calculation remains idle, Xenophon Krokidis, 07/27/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] PAW parallel calculation remains idle, BOTTIN Francois, 07/27/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] PAW parallel calculation remains idle, Xenophon Krokidis, 07/27/2009
- REĀ : [abinit-forum] PAW parallel calculation remains idle, Marc.TORRENT, 07/30/2009
- Re: RE : [abinit-forum] PAW parallel calculation remains idle, Xenophon Krokidis, 07/31/2009
- Re: RE : [abinit-forum] PAW parallel calculation remains idle, BOTTIN Francois, 07/31/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] PAW parallel calculation remains idle, Xenophon Krokidis, 07/27/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] PAW parallel calculation remains idle, BOTTIN Francois, 07/24/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] PAW parallel calculation remains idle, Xenophon Krokidis, 07/24/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] PAW parallel calculation remains idle, BOTTIN Francois, 07/24/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] PAW parallel calculation remains idle, Xenophon Krokidis, 07/24/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] PAW parallel calculation remains idle, Emmanuel Arras, 07/24/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.