forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: mamikon Gulian <mamikon.armen.gulian@gmail.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Response Function Calculation
- Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 00:58:25 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=g/lNSKaQqeYl1gnEeZojIfemsnGWABCLpuUIEShXfUMdg5HbM6h4y7pQ7gWdi+tpBw YLgshpDwztNWP03/dw5TTEVgaEBKQ4Wv2ngdMuzaDUWIAyAzRpCcmbtxwj1Im57THBoP 1yisDnGnVxJJK+/RPxgwf5BoqJb9OTmFfXqgM=
Got it after some playing and convergence testing. ECUT = 14 ate up all the RAM.
Sorry for the disturbance,
M.G.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:23 AM, <mamikon.armen.gulian@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello abiniters,
For exercise I have been trying to calculate the response function of Si with
abinit. For that purpose I modified the file toptic_1.in from the tutorial to
fit Si.It is shown below. My ecut = 14 and my k-point grid = 24x24x24. These
values are the minimum requirement for any degree of accuracy. This is the
portion before the use of the command "optic"; i.e., I make the command "abinis
< toptic_1.files> log".
The run takes a long time but the real problem is in the memory. The combined,
generated files take up over a dozen gigabytes and sometimes the 32-GB-RAM
computer that I am using runs out of RAM.
Is there any way around this? I think I am making some mistake. It's hard to
believe that these calculations could require such exclusive amounts of memory
(especially since 24^3 is the minimum).
Any input or advice on this would be very much appreciated, as even the
slightest modification could free some memory.
Thanks again,
-MG
INPUT:
#Prepare the computation of linear and non-linear optic properties
#Si crystal : ground-state with few bands,
#then non-SCF with a larger number of bands, then ddk for different directions
#Note that the k point sampling shoud be finer for significant results. The
cut-off energy is also too low.
ndtset 6
#First dataset : SC run with kpoints in the IBZ
iscf1 3
nband1 4
nstep1 25
kptopt1 1
nbdbuf1 0
prtden1 1 getden1 0 getwfk1 0 ! Usual file handling data
#Second dataset : NSC run with large number of bands, and points in the IBZ
iscf2 -2
nband2 20 ! This number of bands might be too low for non-linear optics and
real part of linear optics
nstep2 25
kptopt2 1
getwfk2 1 getden2 1 ! Usual file handling data
#Third dataset : NSC run with large number of bands, and points in the the full
BZ
iscf3 -2
nband3 20 ! This number of bands might be too low for non-linear optics and
real part of linear optics
nstep3 25
kptopt3 3
getwfk3 2 getden3 1 ! Usual file handling data
#Fourth dataset : ddk response function along axis 1
iscf4 -3
nband4 20 ! This number of bands might be too low for non-linear optics and
real part of linear optics
nstep4 1 nline4 0
kptopt4 3
nqpt4 1 qpt4 0.0d0 0.0d0 0.0d0
rfdir4 1 0 0
rfelfd4 2
getwfk4 3
#Fifth dataset : ddk response function along axis 2
iscf5 -3
nband5 20 ! This number of bands might be too low for non-linear optics and
real part of linear optics
nstep5 1 nline5 0
kptopt5 3
nqpt5 1 qpt5 0.0d0 0.0d0 0.0d0
rfdir5 0 1 0
rfelfd5 2
getwfk5 3
#Sixth dataset : ddk response function along axis 3
iscf6 -3
nband6 20 ! This number of bands might be too low for non-linear optics and
real part of linear optics
nstep6 1 nline6 0
kptopt6 3
nqpt6 1 qpt6 0.0d0 0.0d0 0.0d0
rfdir6 0 0 1
rfelfd6 2
getwfk6 3
#Data common to all datasets
nshiftk 4
shiftk 0.5 0.5 0.5
0.5 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.5 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.5
ngkpt 24 24 24 # 10 10 10 !This is much too low:should be at least 24x24x24
acell 3*10.27
amu 28.0855 28.0855
diemac 12.0
ecut 14 #7 ! This is also too low
iscf 3
ixc 3
natom 2 nbdbuf 2
ntypat 1
rprim 0 .5 .5 .5 0 .5 .5 .5 0
xred 3*0.00d0 3*0.25d0
tnons 72*0.0
typat 1 1 tolwfr 1.e-20
znucl 14 14
- [abinit-forum] Response Function Calculation, mamikon.armen.gulian, 09/16/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Response Function Calculation, mamikon Gulian, 09/19/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.