Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] Bug in cut3d

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] Bug in cut3d


Chronological Thread 
  • From: BOTTIN Francois <francois.bottin@cea.fr>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Bug in cut3d
  • Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:43:33 +0200
  • Organization: CEA-DAM

Hi,
David is right, it seems that the band/FFT parallelism is switched on.
But I thought that MPI_IO can solve the problem of WF in cut3d.
If you use MPI_IO capabilities (compilation with enable_mpi_io="yes" and execution with accesswff=1), you should be able:
(i) to write the WF file in parallel as it is performed in sequential
(ii) then execute cut3d in sequential and read the WF file without any trouble.
Regards,
Francois

David Waroquiers a écrit :
Hello,

I guess you are using band/FFT parallelism and that you are using 32
processors with npband 32 or something like that ? (next time provide
your input file, it's easier to see where the problem might be).
In this way of parallelization, one has to use the MPI_IO capabilities
of ABINIT to read the wavefunctions. The problem is that it has been
implemented in ABINIT but not (yet ?) in cut3d.
At the moment, one way to avoid this problem is to run in sequential.
Maybe you can try to converge your wavefunction with bands/FFT
parallelisation and then run again a calculation in sequential by just
reading the wavefunction and writing it (just put nstep 1). Maybe
someone could confirm that ?

Hope it helps you ..

On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 16:51 +0200, Philip Murphy wrote:
Dear abinit developers,

While trying to process a wavefunction file with the latest version of
abinit's
cut3d, I get the following message:

rwwf : BUG -
Reading option of rwwf. One should have npw=npw1
However, npw= 3097, and npw1=99133.
Action : contact ABINIT group.


There is nothing out of the ordinary in the way I generated the WF file: a
self
consistent calculation of a supercell with only kpt 0.0 0.0 0.0. I have tried
with and without time reversal symmetry, to no avail.

It seems an odd error, since I am not performing an RF calculation at all, and
npw1 shouldn't be of any consequence.

Please help.

Kind regards,
Philip Murphy


--
##############################################################
Francois Bottin tel: 01 69 26 41 73
CEA/DIF fax: 01 69 26 70 77
BP 12 Bruyeres-le-Chatel email: Francois.Bottin@cea.fr
##############################################################




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page