forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
Re: [abinit-forum] Symmetry detected correctly in primitive cell, then not in doubled supercell?
Chronological Thread
- From: Quan Phung Manh <manhquank9@gmail.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Symmetry detected correctly in primitive cell, then not in doubled supercell?
- Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:01:50 +0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=dp5L/ca76bNqTX0dvgMOK5HOXF14JvhRxIO16/AeIhhkFjeN4em3UuSvtIvs7csdqg taxPs8wLeVHtRc8Sl7uONb3HzmTKzVCqbwl5SUt6r/GdJCW6Vm3mLKaKFWuwvk9VdOcM FYPNNsxWbdlTiouBCl4F20dWSZMS9LEyDS9YM=
Dear Bryce
I don't know how your full input is. But I think your problem comes from the keyword: chkprim 0. You doubled the cell, then Abinit symmetry finder found that the unit cell is not primitive. The multiplicity is 2. The use of non-primitive unit cells is allowed only when the input variable chkprim is 0. I guess you used this keyword to pass the error. That why you had P1.
Regards.
2009/10/22 <bmeredig@gmail.com>
Dear Abinit users,
I'm having symmetry issues... I'm working with a distorted fluorite cell that
should have I4/mmm symmetry. When I use these inputs:
typat 1 2 2
xred
0 0 0
0.25 0.25 0.25
0.75 0.75 0.75
acell
1.0 1.0 1.0 angstrom
rprim
0 2.785 2.745
2.785 0 2.745
2.785 2.785 0
The symmetry finder gives me, correctly, I4/mmm. However, when I simply double
the cell along the c direction so:
typat 1 1 2 2 2 2
xred
0 0 0
0 0 0.5
0.25 0.25 0.125
0.25 0.25 0.625
0.75 0.75 0.375
0.75 0.75 0.875
acell
1.0 1.0 1.0 angstrom
rprim
0 2.785 2.745
2.785 0 2.745
5.57 5.57 0
ABINIT then thinks I have P1 (non)symmetry. However, a tool such as FINDSYM at
http://stokes.byu.edu/cgi-bin/iso/findsym.cgi readily verifies that I still in
fact have I4/mmm symmetry. What could be wrong?
Thanks--
Bryce
--
Quan Phung Manh
Khoa Hoá học - ĐH Khoa học tự nhiên - 19 Lê Thánh Tông Hà Nội
- [abinit-forum] Symmetry detected correctly in primitive cell, then not in doubled supercell?, bmeredig, 10/22/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Symmetry detected correctly in primitive cell, then not in doubled supercell?, Quan Phung Manh, 10/24/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Symmetry detected correctly in primitive cell, then not in doubled supercell?, Bryce Meredig, 10/26/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Symmetry detected correctly in primitive cell, then not in doubled supercell?, Dev Sharma, 10/26/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Symmetry detected correctly in primitive cell, then not in doubled supercell?, Quan Phung Manh, 10/24/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.