forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: jinhong zhang <zhangjinhong2009@gmail.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] heterogeneous slab convergence
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:26:24 +0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Nwi9fRDsoNQw+h5WFWlGt6STnEldedF4Fd2i4DlZ060wOO9kOJXrY8RNquO5yQUHxl OQAQi9H1FDJKC88sbFTMdMj0hf21B6mhQ64tQVA59OjhZeY3bJfbRRvCm5MiP+TjbqTf 0/D6o93zEX2DhCIVgdHO+Ljqv3DjvO8AGLwYg=
maybe it is not right, but maybe it needs large ecut and ngkpt to converge.
by the way how is the thickness of your slab?
2009/12/22 tim <slaughterhouse_give@yahoo.com>
I have an scf convergence issue that I cannot solve. I've done simulations of
bulk ZnS and bulk PbS that converge fine with my pseudopotentials (*.pspnc) and
parameters. I then try a slab calculation, and the PbS converges nicely, but a
heterojunction of PbS|ZnS doesn't converge, no matter what I try. I've changed
iscf from 3-7 and 17, I've done diemix = 0.1-1 with iprcell = 145 and 161, or
I've done diemac of 2~4 instead. I've increased the number of bands, I've
increased the supercell size to get more spacing between atoms.
Is there anything else obvious to do that I'm missing? How do you solve issues
of convergence?
- [abinit-forum] heterogeneous slab convergence, tim, 12/22/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] heterogeneous slab convergence, jinhong zhang, 12/22/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] heterogeneous slab convergence, pascal boulet, 12/22/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.