forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
Re: [abinit-forum] band/fft parallelization: huge memory needed compared to serial mode!
Chronological Thread
- From: TORRENT Marc <marc.torrent@cea.fr>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] band/fft parallelization: huge memory needed compared to serial mode!
- Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:02:14 +0100
- Organization: CEA-DAM
Hi Zeila, I can partly answer to your question. Don't take into account the account of memory announced by abinit in the "paral_kg=1" case. It is probably completely wrong because not implemented for the parallel LOBPCG algorithm. Other remark: iprcel 45 algorithm requires a huge amount of memory when called in band-fft parallel. It could be an explanation.. Marc Le 01/08/10 17:48, Zeila Zanolli a écrit : C7C4FBAF-EA77-4332-A7C5-82D61B132B63@uclouvain.be" type="cite"> |
- [abinit-forum] band/fft parallelization: huge memory needed compared to serial mode!, Zeila Zanolli, 01/08/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] band/fft parallelization: huge memory needed compared to serial mode!, TORRENT Marc, 01/08/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] band/fft parallelization: huge memory needed compared to serial mode!, Zeila Zanolli, 01/08/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] band/fft parallelization: huge memory needed compared to serial mode!, TORRENT Marc, 01/08/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.