forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Mohua Bhattacharya <mohua.simoom@gmail.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] cell optimization
- Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:02:19 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=gEeFDZUuVTUogoWTFy5VKd/cDpbdxRYJmkru0KSY9vPdJupITTyMiew/4Q0RNzlGmV vxhnkZgnGQ7xfw4Dloi6v28WtU3AaNN6jjjFFgbWTDO8FjIVlxW5Dqty7b+TW2RhQoUG +APrZdQDA7hif8UxFyYB2rxP+Swjy5UzN7Wl8=
Hi Martin,
Thank you very much for your help. It worked. What confuses me that the same input file with restartxf 1 and getwfk2 1 worked for the optimization of a different structure with optcell 0 and optcell 1. Thanks again.
Regards
Mohua
2010/2/1 Martin Häufel <martin.haeufel@googlemail.com>
Dear Mohua Bhattacharya,
acc. to the Abinit website:
"Presently, one cannot restart a calculation with a non-zero optcell value from the (x,f) history of another run with a different non-zero optcell value. There are still a few problems at that level. Starting a non-zero optcell run from a zero optcell run should work."
Reference: http://www.abinit.org/documentation/helpfiles/for-v5.8/input_variables/varrlx.html#restartxf
Try leaving out both "restartxf 1" and "getwfk2 1".
Best regards,
Martin Haeufel
TU Munich, WSI (T33)
www.wsi.tum.de
On 02.02.2010 00:31, Mohua Bhattacharya wrote:
Hello,
I have been trying to optimize a perovskite structure using optcell 0
and optcell 1. The first data set completes successfully and the second
data set hangs after a little while. Here is a snippet of my input file
and the end portion of the log file.Please let me know if you have any
suggestions. Thank you very much for your time. Regards
Mohua
**************************************************************************************************************************************
Input file:
ndtset 2
#Set 1 : Internal coordinate optimization
optcell1 0 # modify nuclear positions but no cell shape and dimension
optimization
ionmov1 2
ntime1 150
dilatmx1 2.0
tolmxf1 5.0d-7
prtgeo1 1
# Set 2 : Lattice parameter relaxation (including re-optimization of
internal cordinates)
restartxf 1
getwfk2 1 # Start with wave functions from data set 1
getxred2 -1 # Start with reduced coordinates from dataset 1
# automatic optimization block
ionmov2 2 #structural optimization by
Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno minimization
optcell2 2
ntime2 100
dilatmx2 2.0
tolmxf2 5.0d-7
****************************************************************************************************************************************
end portion of the log file:
hdr_check: Wavefunction file is OK for direct restart of calculation
-P-0000
================================================================================
wfsinp : enter
-P-0000 initwf : disk file gives npw= 27156 nband= 21 for k pt
number= 1
-P-0000 initwf : 21 bands have been initialized from disk
-P-0000 leave_test : synchronization done...
wfsinp: loop on k-points and spins done in parallel
pareigocc : MPI_ALLREDUCE
-P-0000 leave_test : synchronization done...
wfsinp: loop on k-points done in parallel
-P-0000 leave_test : synchronization done...
newkpt: loop on k-points done in parallel
pareigocc : MPI_ALLREDUCE
gstate : reading 0 (x,f) history pairs from input wf file.
setup2: Arith. and geom. avg. npw (full set) are 27116.000 27115.994
symatm: atom number 1 is reached starting at atom
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
symatm: atom number 2 is reached starting at atom
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
symatm: atom number 3 is reached starting at atom
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
symatm: atom number 4 is reached starting at atom
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
symatm: atom number 5 is reached starting at atom
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
- [abinit-forum] cell optimization, Mohua Bhattacharya, 02/02/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] cell optimization, Martin Häufel, 02/02/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] cell optimization, Mohua Bhattacharya, 02/02/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] cell optimization, Martin Haeufel, 02/02/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] cell optimization, Xavier Gonze, 02/02/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] cell optimization, Martin Häufel, 02/02/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] cell optimization, Xavier Gonze, 02/03/2010
- Message not available
- Fwd: [abinit-forum] cell optimization, matthieu verstraete, 02/03/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] cell optimization, Martin Häufel, 02/02/2010
- Message not available
- Fwd: [abinit-forum] cell optimization, matthieu verstraete, 02/03/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] cell optimization, Xavier Gonze, 02/02/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] cell optimization, Martin Haeufel, 02/02/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] cell optimization, Mohua Bhattacharya, 02/02/2010
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [abinit-forum] cell optimization, Mohua Bhattacharya, 02/03/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] cell optimization, Xavier Gonze, 02/12/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] cell optimization, Martin Häufel, 02/02/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.