forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Mozhgan Amini <mozhganamini@yahoo.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Relaxing only atomic positions
- Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 06:16:23 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=De+9tyaUzb6Mg/ZFxCN7zRVfrUNkCnur1UJoMHGQmzlYBZxBIL2j2w1Egf6ApW7fboZa3Mul78jTAw7Bu8+Ky9yexQES+UvvhlDCgZ1klQFMOoDxOWc+RDo6BcXobzRD9i63nCVY3MLaq6jGJgg1VKhtPhGbqHCVfnDCEFqruKc=;
Dear Igor, I don't want to fix atomic positions, I only want to restrict them in order to avoid overlapping problem in paw calculation! Best, Mozhgan --- On Thu, 2/4/10, Igor Lukacevic <ilukacevic@fizika.unios.hr> wrote:
|
- [abinit-forum] Relaxing only atomic positions, mozhganamini, 02/04/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] Relaxing only atomic positions, Igor Lukacevic, 02/04/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] Relaxing only atomic positions, Mozhgan Amini, 02/04/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] Relaxing only atomic positions, Martin Häufel, 02/04/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] Relaxing only atomic positions, Igor Lukacevic, 02/04/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.