forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: <g930102@ccit.edu.tw>
- To: <forum@abinit.org>, <rignanese@pcpm.ucl.ac.be>
- Subject: Some comments about GW calculation in ABINIT
- Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 02:42:12 +0800
Some comment about GW calculation in ABINIT
Dear Dr. Gian-Marco:
I am study the topics of the GW calculation in solids at present.
Except the ABINIT( GW calculation based on PP & PW, Plane wave
and PseudoPotentials),I am also use the DFTGWA (GW calculation
based on All Electrons FP-LMTO). I have ported DFTGWA(fpgw020)
into Intel(Compiler)/Linux(OS)/PC(Vendor) version in my own site.
In my points of view, DFTGWA is GW calculation exclusively.
You could to do execution LMTO and GW separately. The scheme some
like as GWA in ABINIT before V3.4. So I have no difficulty to
switch each one, even though there are drastically different from
input scheme(Lattice coordinates and Cartesian coordinates,
for example).
I think not all of peoples need to GW calculation in his work.
Because of "computing GW corrections is a quite heavy calculations"
(cited from Mike Zhang and Gian-Marco Rignanese communications).
In my experiments, it is count by day for GW calculations for both
packages(DFTGWA and ABINIT).
(ZincBlende: MP mesh 8x8x8, 29 k-points, 512 k-points in IBZ,
29 q-points. WurtZite: MP mesh 6x6x4, 21 k-points, 144 k-points in
IBZ, 21 q-points. May could covers full band calculations in
coarsely?) (DFTGWA use the tetrahedron approach which is conventional
method for LMTO)
I am expect the ABINIT V3.4x could work in P6/DOS/Windows. I have
triedto work it out, but I am failed in memory allocation. This is
caused by GW code integration with ABINIT, needs more arrays space.
That is what I am encountered. So I wonder "Availability's Policy
Change: Do not support sequential version in Dos/Win after 3.4?",
I think Dr. Luc Sindic have much heavy work in the near future.
I am sorry that I have not test run V3.4x in Linux? May be it will
give a surprise to me. But to my knowledge, there will exhaust most
resourcesin computer while GW code integration with ABINIT. May be
I am too worry?
Best regards,
Lu Fu-Fa Sep/05/2002
=======================================================
Lu Fu-Fa, Doctoral Student, E-mail: g930102@ccit.edu.tw
Semiconductors Lab., Dept. of Applied Physics
Chung Cheng Institute of Technology (CCIT), TW
=======================================================
___________________________________
NOCC, http://nocc.sourceforge.net
- Some comments about GW calculation in ABINIT, g930102, 09/05/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.