Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - RE: [abinit-forum] For GWA only: Program not complete in Src_3gw/lattice.f

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

RE: [abinit-forum] For GWA only: Program not complete in Src_3gw/lattice.f


Chronological Thread 
  • From: <michel.cote@umontreal.ca>
  • To: <forum@abinit.org>
  • Subject: RE: [abinit-forum] For GWA only: Program not complete in Src_3gw/lattice.f
  • Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 13:45:19 -0400


Dear Gian-Marco and dear all,

I am all in favor of the integration of the GWA in Abinit. It will be a great
advantage to have the same input/ouput format as the rest of the program.

Michel Côté

***************************************************************
Michel Cote tel: +1 (514) 343-5628
Professeur adjoint fax: +1 (514) 343-2071
Département de physique
Université de Montréal
C.P. 6128, succ. Centre-ville
Montréal (Québec) H3C 3J7 Michel.Cote@umontreal.ca
Canada http://carbone.pmc.umontreal.ca/~michel
***************************************************************


> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Gian-Marco Rignanese [mailto:rignanese@pcpm.ucl.ac.be]
> Envoyé : 5 septembre, 2002 01:41
> À : forum@abinit.org
> Objet : Re: [abinit-forum] For GWA only: Program not complete in
> Src_3gw/lattice.f
>
>
> Dear Lu Fu-Fa,
>
> is there any specific reason why you wrote the following?
>
> > Have fun with GWA in ABINIT before V3.4 !
> > (I am really hope that GWA module could keep separation
> with ABINIT.)
>
> For all,
>
> I would like to have your comment about this topic... We
> thought that it
> would better to have a uniform input/output format and to
> share routines
> between the two codes. Of course, the integration is far from
> perfect at
> this stage (see the mail of Lu Fu-Fa).
>
> If there is majority out there that thinks that the
> integration is not
> the right way to go, they should say it...
>
> Best regards,
>
> Gian-Marco.
>
>



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page