forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Xavier Gonze <gonze@pcpm.ucl.ac.be>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] constrained M calculations
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 08:37:03 +0200
Dear Jorge,
Jorge Iniguez wrote:
Dear abinitioners,
A couple of weeks ago Gilles Z. mentioned the possibility of doing
calculations with magnetization constrained to lie along a given spatial
direction (see emails about Berry curvature & Chern number sent by H. Min
as well as GZ's response).
I think it is worth to implement such option in abinit. At the very least,
it would allow us to check whether the spinor calculations are working
properly.
Yes !
The spinor part of ABINIT was tested already, but I do not think it has
been used for a real scientific work, so I would not consider it as likely
bug-free !
There are so many issues beyond the first, obvious tests ...
As you see, I give very similar "seeds" with spinat... but get five
different answers. The AF modification in spinat5 (which is the way to
reduce the system energy, since the system ground state is AF) is
completely missed by the first four runs. (Note that this problem will be
present even if we do not have spin orbit. An spinor calculation should be
able to find the ground state (FE or AF) of the system, right?) Regarding
the first four cases, one could be tempted to think that the energy
differences involved are so small that the run gets converged before
actually finding the minimum (in spite of the very small tolerance used).
However, case 5 involves relatively large energy differences and the
program fails to go all the way up to an AF ordering. This seems to imply
something is not working as it should with the spinor calculation? (If
somebody thinks the above results can be easily explained and there is
nothing to worry about, please let me know :)
Seems strange indeed ...
Being able to set the magnetization direction would be helpful to
understand what is happening here. (Maybe the above result is simply
indicating that the energy landscape of the system is very complicated? We
could answer that question if we were able to fix the direction of M.) It
would also allow to calculate magnetic anisotropies, etc.
I would very much like to work in the implementation of this.
Thanks for this offer !!! ;-)
Best regards,
Xavier
- constrained M calculations, Jorge Iniguez, 06/16/2003
- Re: [abinit-forum] constrained M calculations, Xavier Gonze, 06/17/2003
- [abinit-forum] memana error, Masatake Takahashi, 06/18/2003
- Re: [abinit-forum] memana error, verstraete, 06/18/2003
- [abinit-forum] memana error, Masatake Takahashi, 06/18/2003
- Re: [abinit-forum] constrained M calculations, Xavier Gonze, 06/17/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.