forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: James Raynolds <JRaynolds@uamail.albany.edu>
- To: "'forum@abinit.org'" <forum@abinit.org>
- Cc: Lenore Mullin <lenore@cs.albany.edu>
- Subject: RE: [abinit-forum] FFTs in parallel
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 10:00:21 -0400
Steven,
My colleague Lenore Mullin and myself at the University at Albany,
State University of New York, are working on FFT's and have OPENMP and MPI
versions of very efficient 1-d FFTS which we can provide you. We are nearly
finished with a 3-d version which we believe to be the fastest available
anywhere.
Sincerely,
Jim Raynolds
-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Homolya [mailto:Steven.Homolya@spme.monash.edu.au]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 6:06 AM
To: sympa@abinit.org
Cc: abinit
Subject: [abinit-forum] FFTs in parallel
Dear All,
I noticed that for d-electron elements, the high ecut required means that
FFTs dominate memory and CPU time requirements. It seems like the FFTs
would be a good starting point for distributed memory parallelisation that
goes beyond k-point parallelisation and allows us to treat very large
cases.
Is anyone working on parallelising the FFTs?
If not, I'm considering implementing it using MPI version of fftw. If I do
decide to go ahead with it, which version of the code should I start with,
so that the modifications might be included in future releases?
Steve
--
Steven Homolya
School of Physics and Materials Engineering
Monash University, VIC 3800
Australia
Tel: +61 3 9905 3694
Fax: +61 3 9905 3637
- RE: [abinit-forum] FFTs in parallel, James Raynolds, 10/20/2003
- RE: [abinit-forum] FFTs in parallel, Steven Homolya, 10/21/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: [abinit-forum] FFTs in parallel, James Raynolds, 10/21/2003
- Re: [abinit-forum] FFTs in parallel, Xavier Gonze, 10/21/2003
- RE: [abinit-forum] FFTs in parallel, James Raynolds, 10/21/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.